Skip to content

Conversation

@iklam
Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam commented Oct 21, 2025

This fixes a recent bug in AOTMapLogger that's exposed in macOS 26 testing.

When running the JVM with a valid AOT cache (or AOT cache) with the flag -Xlog:aot+map=debug, we use AOTMapLogger::RuntimeGatherArchivedMetaspaceObjs to discover all metaspace objects that are contained in the AOT cache.

However, this code is executed after some of the AOT-cached classes are linked. As a result, RuntimeGatherArchivedMetaspaceObjs::do_unique_ref() could see instances of AdapterHandlerEntry which are dynamically allocated and their addresses are outside of the AOT cache.

In all platforms except macOS 26, the AdapterHandlerEntry pointers are all above the address range of the AOT cache, and they are filtered out by subsequent code in AOTMapLogger. However, on macOS 26, the AdapterHandlerEntry pointers are below the AOT cache, and they caused this assert to fail:

if (p < rw_base) {
// We are printing the dynamic archive but found an object in the static archive
precond(!mapinfo->is_static());

The fix is simple: filter out all pointers that are outside of the address range of the AOT cache in do_unique_ref().


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8370248: AOTMapLogger should check if pointer is in AOTMetaspace (Bug - P2)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27918/head:pull/27918
$ git checkout pull/27918

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27918
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27918/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27918

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27918

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27918.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 21, 2025

👋 Welcome back iklam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 21, 2025

@iklam This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8370248: AOTMapLogger should check if pointer is in AOTMetaspace

Reviewed-by: kvn, adinn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 13 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 21, 2025

@iklam The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 21, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 21, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 21, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@adinn adinn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@iklam
Copy link
Member Author

iklam commented Oct 22, 2025

Thanks @vnkozlov @adinn for the review
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2025

Going to push as commit 70e7861.
Since your change was applied there have been 24 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 22, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 22, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 22, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2025

@iklam Pushed as commit 70e7861.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-runtime [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants