Skip to content

fix(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.2 #634

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 4, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
ts-jest (source) 29.1.4 -> 29.3.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

kulshekhar/ts-jest (ts-jest)

v29.3.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • fix: transpile js files from node_modules whenever Jest asks (968370e), closes #​4637

v29.3.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • fix: allow isolatedModules mode to have ts.Program under Node16/Next (25157eb)
  • fix: improve message for isolatedModules of ts-jest config (547eb6f)

v29.3.0

Compare Source

Features
  • feat: support hybrid module values for isolatedModules: true (f372121)
Bug Fixes
  • fix: set customConditions to undefined in TsCompiler (b091d70), closes #​4620
Code Refactoring
  • refactor: remove manual version checker (89458fc)
  • refactor: remove patching deps based on version checker (bac4c43)
  • refactor: deprecate RawCompilerOptions interface (2b1b6cd)
  • refactor: deprecate transform option isolatedModules (7dfef71)

v29.2.6

Compare Source

v29.2.5

Compare Source

v29.2.4

Compare Source

v29.2.3

Compare Source

v29.2.2

Compare Source

v29.2.1

Compare Source

v29.2.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • fix: don't show warning message with Node16/NodeNext (99c4f49), closes #​4266
Features
  • feat(cli): allow migrating cjs presets to transform config (22fb027)
  • feat(presets): add util functions to create ESM presets (06f78ed), close #​4200
  • feat(presets): add util functions to create CJS presets (f9cc3c0), close #​4200
Code refactoring
  • refactor: replace lodash deps with native js implementation (40f1708)
  • refactor: use TsJestTransformerOptions type everywhere possibly (7d001be)
  • refactor(cli): use new preset util functions to initialize test config (c2b56ca)
  • refactor(presets): use create preset util functions for cjs presets (922d6d0)
  • test: switch react-app to use Vite (827c8ad)

v29.1.5

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.2.6 fix(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.0 Mar 24, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x branch 4 times, most recently from 6ac9984 to 0f32a19 Compare March 28, 2025 11:58
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.0 fix(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.1 Mar 31, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x branch 2 times, most recently from 83bd62f to 41047d3 Compare April 1, 2025 13:48
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x branch from 41047d3 to f005cd3 Compare April 11, 2025 17:36
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.1 fix(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.2 Apr 13, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x branch from f005cd3 to 91247e3 Compare April 13, 2025 09:52
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x branch from 91247e3 to 5dd4b05 Compare April 28, 2025 20:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants