-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 599
config-linux: Convert linux.namespaces from an array to an object #598
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then empty and absence have different meanings, I think that's some confusing we are trying to avoid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm ok making that distinction (like I'm ok distinguishing unset and
null). If the consensus is that we shouldn't make that distinction, alternatives include:a. Using
anyOfto allow boolean or namespace-object values and requiringpathin namespace-objects. E.g."pid": trueor"pid": {"path": "..."}. This is clear in JSON Schema, but may be awkward to unmarshal in Go.b. Replace namespace objects with the path string, and distinguish between unset, empty, and non-empty strings. This makes namespace payload extension more difficult, but I don't hear anyone calling for namespace extension at the moment.
c. Keep the namespace object, require
path, and distinguish between empty and non-empty strings. This is just exchanging empty-string checking (one level deeper) for the empy-object check that currently concerns you.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
d. Adding a
newboolean to the namespace object and erroring ifnewis true andpathis set/non-empty.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm leaning towards
b, as you said, as long as we don't have the need for namespace extension, it should be enough.For better future extension,
clooks better though.awill be really disaster for json unmarshaling, anddlooks redundant.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both (b) and (c) are really close to the PR's current approach. Do folks really see a significant difference between switching on empty strings vs. empty objects?