[Feat] provide a editable installation way for tools like uv #1579
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
zgjja
force-pushed
the
main
branch
2 times, most recently
from
8bad5df to
d5fd1b8
Compare
zgjja
changed the title
str
Author
|
@HAOCHENYE i think this one can be reviewed. P.S. ruff may be the better tool for linting when working with uv. popular packages like transformers are using it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
when using modern build system like uv, mmengine cannot use editable install, this PR fix it.
besides, yapf, isort tools can also be replaced by uv in the future for better performance and easier management.