Normalize workflow naming across runtime and authoring contracts - #776
Open
onevcat wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Normalize workflow naming across runtime and authoring contracts#776onevcat wants to merge 1 commit into
onevcat wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Workflow authoring used overlapping names for definition metadata, run metadata, action results, and participant deliveries. This change establishes one naming contract across the runtime, CLI, schemas, bundled examples, documentation, and shipped skills.
This is the naming slice before D3. The collector still collects one Git directory; handoff migration and additional collectors remain separate work.
Validation: make check (150 script tests), CLI build and smoke checks, 291 CLI unit tests, 112 CLI integration tests, 3147 app tests, and make build-app passed. Three sequential adversarial review rounds cover runtime boundaries, schemas, references, and the naming check.