Skip to content

Conversation

@bratpiorka
Copy link
Contributor

@bratpiorka bratpiorka commented Oct 21, 2025

@bratpiorka bratpiorka marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2025 14:08
@bratpiorka bratpiorka requested a review from a team as a code owner October 21, 2025 14:08
params, residentDevices.data(), residentDevices.size()),
UMF_RESULT_SUCCESS);
EXPECT_EQ(
umfLevelZeroMemoryProviderParamsSetResidentDevices(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NIT: maybe this function should accept size_t instead of uint32_t - i think other functions in UMF uses size_t in similar places

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we are not consistent here - this was missed in API 1.0 review :( e.g.

umf_result_t umfOsMemoryProviderParamsSetNumaList(
    umf_os_memory_provider_params_handle_t hParams, unsigned *numa_list,
    unsigned numa_list_len);

@lukaszstolarczuk lukaszstolarczuk merged commit c5c751c into oneapi-src:main Oct 22, 2025
147 of 148 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants