Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove dealing with descr and url files #6253
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Remove dealing with descr and url files #6253
Changes from 2 commits
612ff8c
b43c23e
fc6454e
adb134e
9805cd4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this command supposed to work only on 2.0 repos ? if yes, there is no need to handle url files. It is sufficient to have a check at the beginning and fail with a hint to
opam admin upgrade
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we still need them for upgrade functions. We can mark them as deprecated for use in external libraries, but opam lib need to keep for backward compatibility ftm.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we still need them for upgrade functions. We can mark them as deprecated for use in external libraries, but opam lib need to keep for backward compatibility ftm.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what if we simply stopped supporting opam 1.x instead? 6 and a half years seems like a reasonable time for people to upgrade from a deprecated format
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that case, we should remove all 1.2 upgrade code, not only a part.
6 years to upgrade is a reasonable time indeed, but if the code do not require maintenance, why do we need to remove it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it does not require maintenance per say but it holds us back from doing this type of change for example, which we could also call as some kind of maintenance burden
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
descr & url reading & handling should be moved to
OpamFormatUpgrade.opam_file
orOpamFormatUpgrade.opam_file_from_1_2_to_2_0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note to myself: