-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
[new release] mirage (2 packages) (4.10.4) #28942
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
CHANGES: - Refactor `right_tcpip_library` (mirage/mirage#1622 @reynir, review by @hannesm) - Correctly compare package pins when merging (mirage/mirage#1623 @reynir, review by @hannesm)
jmid
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
There are runtest failures on 5.2-5.4 caused by small expect test output differences it seems:
https://opam.ci.ocaml.org/github/ocaml/opam-repository/commit/6f0fc6a951253ffe47c1572d3ded0aa67df3d990/variant/compilers,5.4,mirage.4.10.4,tests
#=== ERROR while compiling mirage.4.10.4 ======================================#
# context 2.5.0~beta1 | linux/x86_64 | ocaml-base-compiler.5.4.0 | pinned(https://github.com/mirage/mirage/releases/download/v4.10.4/mirage-4.10.4.tbz)
# path ~/.opam/5.4/.opam-switch/build/mirage.4.10.4
# command ~/.opam/opam-init/hooks/sandbox.sh build dune runtest -p mirage -j 71
# exit-code 1
# env-file ~/.opam/log/mirage-7-83e5fc.env
# output-file ~/.opam/log/mirage-7-83e5fc.out
### output ###
# (cd _build/default/test/mirage && ./test.exe)
# Testing `mirage'.
# This run has ID `PHMM5IIN'.
#
# [OK] basic 0 pp.
#
# Full test results in `~/.opam/5.4/.opam-switch/build/mirage.4.10.4/_build/default/test/mirage/_build/_tests/mirage'.
# Test Successful in 0.000s. 1 test run.
# (cd _build/default/test/functoria && ./test.exe)
# Testing `functoria'.
# This run has ID `WXOQX4PO'.
#
# [OK] cli 0 read_full_eval.
# [OK] cli 1 configure.
[...]
# [OK] version 3 unmet comment.
#
# Full test results in `~/.opam/5.4/.opam-switch/build/mirage.4.10.4/_build/default/test/functoria/_build/_tests/functoria'.
# Test Successful in 0.007s. 41 tests run.
# File "test/functoria/e2e/errors.t", line 1, characters 0-0:
# /usr/bin/git --no-pager diff --no-index --color=always -u _build/default/test/functoria/e2e/errors.t _build/default/test/functoria/e2e/errors.t.corrected
# diff --git a/_build/default/test/functoria/e2e/errors.t b/_build/default/test/functoria/e2e/errors.t.corrected
# index 637ded6..7a1c9e0 100644
# --- a/_build/default/test/functoria/e2e/errors.t
# +++ b/_build/default/test/functoria/e2e/errors.t.corrected
# @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ of a device's connect function:
# $ dune build
# File "errors/in_device.ml", line 6, characters 2-26:
# Error: Unbound value Unikernel_make__4.start'
# - Hint: Did you mean start?
# + Hint: Did you mean Unikernel_make__4.start?
# [1]
# $ ./test.exe clean -f errors/in_device.ml
#
# @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Then, not enough:
# $ ./test.exe configure -f errors/in_functor_not_enough.ml
# test.exe: [WARNING] Skipping version check, since our_version ("1.0~test") fails to parse: only digits and . allowed in version
# $ dune build
# - File "errors/test/main.ml", line 34, characters 3-26:
# + File "errors/test/main.ml", line 34, characters 3-20:
# Error: The module Unikernel_make__4 is a functor, it cannot have any components
# [1]
# $ ./test.exe clean -f errors/in_functor_not_enough.ml
To keep the CI noise level down it would be nice to fix these...
Co-authored-by: Hannes Mehnert <[email protected]>
|
For the salsa-core CI error I opened a separate issue #28956 |
jmid
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, LGTM!
I believe I've seen most of the remaining revdeps failures before 👍
|
Yes I don't think there is any new failure. Thanks! |
The MirageOS library operating system
CHANGES:
right_tcpip_library(Refactor right_tcpip_library mirage/mirage#1622 @reynir, review by @hannesm)