[new release] reason-react (2 packages) (0.16.0)

[davesnx]

Reason bindings for React.js

• Project page: https://reasonml.github.io/reason-react
• Documentation: https://reasonml.github.io/reason-react

CHANGES:

• FEATURE: add color to domProps (@tatchi in add color to domProps reasonml/reason-react#871)
• BREAKING: Support for React 19 (@davesnx in Support for React 19 reasonml/reason-react#846)
• DOCS: Documentation updates for 0.16 (@davesnx in Documentation updates for 0.16 reasonml/reason-react#864)
• INFRA: Update deps (@johnhaley81 in Update deps reasonml/reason-react#876)
• INFRA: update setup-ocaml to v3 (@anmonteiro in update setup-ocaml to v3 reasonml/reason-react#878)
• FIX: Remove raise annotations and fix locations on errors (@davesnx Remove raise annotations and fix locations on errors reasonml/reason-react#863)
• FIX: type of pipeable stream to allow objects with keys (@anmonteiro in fix: type of pipeable stream to allow objects with keys reasonml/reason-react#854)
• FEATURE: Add preconnect, prefetchDNS, preinit, preinitModule, preload and preloadModule in ReactDOM.Experimental (@r17x in feat(react-dom): add experimental module reasonml/reason-react#849)
• BREAKING: Make lowerbound be Melange 5.1 (due to Js.FormData.t usage)

[Zeta611]

There are multiple CI failures with

# File "ppx/reason_react_ppx.ml", lines 573-578, characters 12-13:
# 573 | ............{
# 574 |               pvb_pat = Builder.ppat_var ~loc { txt = key_var_txt; loc };
# 575 |               pvb_expr = mapper#expression ctxt key;
# 576 |               pvb_attributes = [];
# 577 |               pvb_loc = loc;
# 578 |             }.
# Error: Some record fields are undefined: "pvb_constraint"

Is this expected?

[davesnx]

I haven't looked deeply but it seems like ppxlib upper bound for ppxlib should discard 0.36.0

[mseri]

Looks like the tests of the ppx package need reason-react itself. Should we disable them?

[davesnx]

Yeah, pushing the same build as 0.15 (which effectively remove the test alias). This is safe since we run the CI in our gh actions constantly.

[mseri]

Thanks