Skip to content

Releases: obinexus/libpolycall

Polyglot Binding Mesh - Pre-P2P Checkpoint Release

19 Sep 14:44
@obinexus obinexus
v3.experimental.0.stable.0
3ec3f3f

Choose a tag to compare

View all tags
Polyglot Binding Mesh - Pre-P2P Checkpoint Release Latest
Latest

CRITICAL: This is a CHECKPOINT RELEASE establishing the foundation for binding-to-binding communication. Current state: bindings communicate through LibPolyCall core ONLY. Direct binding-to-binding is NOT YET IMPLEMENTED.

📍 Checkpoint Status

What Works Now:

  • ✅ All bindings communicate through polycall.exe runtime
  • ✅ Go binding on port 3003:8083
  • ✅ Java binding on port 3002:8082
  • ✅ COBOL binding (CBLPolyCall) integrated
  • ✅ Glue philosophy enforced (no direct binding imports)

What This Release Prepares For:

  • 🚧 Direct binding-to-binding P2P communication
  • 🚧 Hybrid bus-star topology implementation
  • 🚧 Cost recovery protocol for fault tolerance
  • 🚧 Distributed node cost analysis

🏗️ Architecture Blueprint

Current State (Checkpoint)

┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │ Go │────▶│ │◀────│ Java │────▶│ │ │ Binding │ │ LibPoly │ │ Binding │ │ LibPoly │ │ :8083 │ │ Call │ │ :8082 │ │ Call │ └──────────┘ │ Core │ └──────────┘ │ Core │ │ :8000 │ │ :8000 │ ┌──────────┐ │ │ ┌──────────┐ │ │ │ COBOL │────▶│ │◀────│ Rust │────▶│ │ │ Binding │ └──────────┘ │ Binding │ └──────────┘ │ :8081 │ │ :8082 │ └──────────┘ └──────────┘


#### Target State (Post-Checkpoint)

Hybrid Bus-Star P2P/S2P Topology with Cost Recovery

     ┌─────────────────┐
     │   Cost Arbiter  │
     │   (Recovery)    │
     └────────┬────────┘
              │
 ┌────────────┼────────────┐
 │            │            │

┌────▼────┐ ┌────▼────┐ ┌────▼────┐ │ Go │◀─▶│ Java │◀─▶│ Rust │ │ Node │ │ Node │ │ Node │ └─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘ ▲ ▲ ▲ │ │ │ └────────────┼────────────┘ ┌───▼───┐ │ COBOL │ │ Node │ └───────┘

P2P: Peer-to-Peer direct communication S2P: Server-to-Peer hierarchical routing Cost Recovery: Fault detection and node cost analysis


### 🔧 Configuration for Future P2P

# config/polyglot-mesh.yaml
checkpoint:
  version: "3.experimental.0.stable.0"
  mode: "centralized"  # Will become "distributed" post-checkpoint
  
bindings:
  go:
    port: 3003:8083
    cost_weight: 1.0
    reliability: 0.98
    
  java:
    port: 3002:8082
    cost_weight: 1.2
    reliability: 0.95
    
  rust:
    port: 8082
    cost_weight: 0.8
    reliability: 0.99
    
  cobol:
    port: 8081
    cost_weight: 1.5
    reliability: 0.92

topology:
  current: "star"  # All through LibPolyCall
  target: "hybrid-bus-star-p2p"
  
fault_tolerance:
  enabled: false  # Will be enabled post-checkpoint
  cost_recovery_protocol: "pending"
  node_election: "cost-based"
</code></pre>
<h3>📊 Cost Recovery Protocol (Planned)</h3>
<pre><code class="language-rust">// Future implementation placeholder
pub struct NodeCost {
    pub latency_ms: f64,
    pub memory_mb: u64,
    pub cpu_percent: f32,
    pub failure_rate: f64,
    pub recovery_time_ms: u64,
}

pub trait CostRecoveryProtocol {
    fn calculate_node_cost(&amp;self) -&gt; NodeCost;
    fn elect_primary_node(&amp;self, nodes: Vec&lt;NodeCost&gt;) -&gt; NodeId;
    fn initiate_failover(&amp;self, failed_node: NodeId) -&gt; Result&lt;NodeId&gt;;
}
</code></pre>
<h3>⚠️ Breaking Changes Warning</h3>
<p><strong>THIS IS A CHECKPOINT</strong> - Future releases will introduce:</p>
<ul>
<li>Direct binding-to-binding communication (bypassing core)</li>
<li>New port allocations for P2P mesh</li>
<li>Cost-based routing algorithms</li>
<li>Potential API changes for distributed operations</li>
</ul>
<h3>🔄 Rollback Instructions</h3>
<p>If post-checkpoint implementations fail:</p>
<pre><code class="language-bash"># Rollback to this checkpoint
git checkout v3.experimental.0.stable.0

# Restore centralized topology
./scripts/restore-checkpoint.sh

# Verify system stability
./scripts/verify-bindings.sh --mode centralized
</code></pre>
<h3>📦 Current Working Bindings</h3>

Binding | Status | Port | Repository
-- | -- | -- | --
Go | ✅ Stable | 3003:8083 | /bindings/go-polycall
Java | ✅ Stable | 3002:8082 | /bindings/java-polycall
COBOL | ✅ Stable | 8081 | /bindings/cblpolycall
Rust | 🚧 Integration | 8082 | github.com/obinexus/rust-semverx


<h3>🧪 Testing This Checkpoint</h3>
<pre><code class="language-bash"># Verify all bindings work through core
./test/checkpoint-test.sh

# Test current topology
curl http://localhost:8000/topology
# Expected: {"mode": "star", "bindings": 4}

# Verify no direct binding communication
./test/verify-no-p2p.sh
# Expected: All traffic routed through :8000
</code></pre>
<h3>🚀 Next Development Phase</h3>
<p>Post-checkpoint implementation roadmap:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Phase 1</strong>: Implement binding discovery protocol</li>
<li><strong>Phase 2</strong>: Add P2P handshake mechanism</li>
<li><strong>Phase 3</strong>: Implement cost calculation algorithms</li>
<li><strong>Phase 4</strong>: Add fault detection and recovery</li>
<li><strong>Phase 5</strong>: Enable hybrid topology switching</li>
</ol>
<h3>📝 Developer Notes</h3>
<pre><code class="language-bash"># DO NOT implement direct binding communication yet
# This checkpoint ensures we can rollback if P2P fails

# Current binding communication flow:
# Binding A → LibPolyCall Core → Binding B

# Future binding communication flow (NOT YET):
# Binding A ←→ Binding B (direct P2P)
# with fallback to core routing on failure
</code></pre>
<h3>🔒 Stability Guarantees</h3>
<p>This checkpoint release guarantees:</p>
<ul>
<li>All bindings functional through LibPolyCall core</li>
<li>No experimental P2P code affecting stability</li>
<li>Clean rollback point before distributed architecture</li>
<li>Tested glue philosophy compliance</li>
</ul>
<h3>⚡ Known Limitations</h3>
<ul>
<li>No direct binding-to-binding communication (by design)</li>
<li>All traffic routes through central LibPolyCall instance</li>
<li>No cost-based routing decisions</li>
<li>No automatic failover between bindings</li>
<li>Single point of failure at LibPolyCall core</li>
</ul>
<h3>📊 Metrics Baseline</h3>
<pre><code class="language-yaml"># Performance baseline for comparison
checkpoint_metrics:
  average_latency: 15ms
  throughput: 10000 req/s
  memory_usage: 512MB
  cpu_usage: 25%
  binding_startup_time: 3s
</code></pre>
<hr>
<p><strong>CRITICAL REMINDER</strong>: This is a DEVELOPMENT CHECKPOINT. The binding-to-binding P2P/S2P hybrid topology is NOT implemented. This release establishes a stable fallback point.</p>
<p><strong>Repositories:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Core: github.com/obinexus/libpolycall</li>
<li>Rust Extensions: github.com/obinexus/rust-semverx</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Docker Image</strong>: <code>obinexus/polyglot-checkpoint:3.0.0</code></p>
<p><strong>SHA256</strong>: <code>pending-ci-build</code></p>
<p><strong>Rollback Command</strong>: <code>git checkout v3.experimental.0.stable.0</code></p>
<pre><code>
Assets 4
Loading

LibPolyCall v1.0 🚀 The Future is Now

10 Sep 21:56
@obinexus obinexus
v1.0.stable.0.stable.0.stable
fefbf7d

Choose a tag to compare

View all tags
LibPolyCall v1.0 🚀 The Future is Now

LibPolyCall v1.0 🚀 The Polymorphic Revolution

dropping the first official release of LibPolyCall - the polymorphic
function call system that's about to change the game fr fr

what's in the box? 📦

  • Core DRIVER (polycall): C-based polymorphic routing engine
  • 5 Language Bindings: Python, Go, Java, Node.js, Lua
  • Banking System Demo: Full production example with zero-downtime updates
  • SemVerX Integration: State-based versioning (stable/legacy/experimental)

key features ✨

  • 🔥 Hot-Swapping: Replace components without stopping the system
  • 🌐 Polyglot: Mix any language in one system
  • 🛡️ Zero-Trust Security: Port enforcement & protocol validation
  • 📊 State Management: Built-in state machine with snapshots

quick start ⚡

# Clone and build
git clone https://github.com/obinexus/libpolycall.git
cd libpolycall
make all

# Start the DRIVER
./libpolycall/bin/polycall -f libpolycall/config.Polycallfile

# Run banking demo
cd projects/banking-system
python src/server.py

version info 🏷️

v1.0.stable.0.stable.0.stable

  • Major: 1 (first production release)
  • Minor: 0 (foundation features)
  • Patch: 0 (initial release)
  • All components marked as stable

what's next? 🔮

  • v1.1: COBOL binding integration
  • v1.2: Rust binding with async support
  • v2.0: AI-powered routing optimization

documentation 📚

Loading