Skip to content

[18.0][MIG] l10n_es_aeat_mod303_special_prorate_regularization_capital_asset: Migration to 18.0#851

Open
deeniiz wants to merge 9 commits into18.0from
18.0-mig-l10n_es_aeat_mod303_special_prorate_regularization_capital_asset
Open

[18.0][MIG] l10n_es_aeat_mod303_special_prorate_regularization_capital_asset: Migration to 18.0#851
deeniiz wants to merge 9 commits into18.0from
18.0-mig-l10n_es_aeat_mod303_special_prorate_regularization_capital_asset

Conversation

@deeniiz
Copy link
Collaborator

@deeniiz deeniiz commented Mar 3, 2026

No description provided.

@deeniiz deeniiz force-pushed the 18.0-mig-l10n_es_aeat_mod303_special_prorate_regularization_capital_asset branch from 5a8e924 to a18c9c7 Compare March 3, 2026 16:52
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 3, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 33.84615% with 129 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (18.0@4b294fd). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...rate_regularization_capital_asset/models/mod303.py 22.22% 112 Missing ⚠️
...set/models/capital_asset_prorate_regularization.py 46.66% 16 Missing ⚠️
...zation_capital_asset/models/l10n_es_aeat_report.py 83.33% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             18.0     #851   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   33.84%           
=======================================
  Files           ?        7           
  Lines           ?      195           
  Branches        ?       32           
=======================================
  Hits            ?       66           
  Misses          ?      129           
  Partials        ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@deeniiz deeniiz requested a review from eantones March 3, 2026 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants