Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nuclia Evaluation Library v1.0.0 #1

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

Nuclia Evaluation Library v1.0.0 #1

merged 21 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

carlesonielfa
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 19, 2024

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines Covered Coverage Threshold Status
157 157 100% 90% 🟢

New Files

File Coverage Status
src/nuclia_eval/init.py 100% 🟢
src/nuclia_eval/exceptions.py 100% 🟢
src/nuclia_eval/metrics/init.py 100% 🟢
src/nuclia_eval/metrics/answer_relevance.py 100% 🟢
src/nuclia_eval/metrics/base.py 100% 🟢
src/nuclia_eval/metrics/context_relevance.py 100% 🟢
src/nuclia_eval/metrics/groundedness.py 100% 🟢
src/nuclia_eval/models/init.py 100% 🟢
src/nuclia_eval/models/base.py 100% 🟢
src/nuclia_eval/models/remi.py 100% 🟢
src/nuclia_eval/settings.py 100% 🟢
src/nuclia_eval/utils.py 100% 🟢
TOTAL 100% 🟢

Modified Files

No covered modified files...

updated for commit: 73d4521 by action🐍

@carlesonielfa carlesonielfa changed the title Nuclia Evaluation Library V0 Nuclia Evaluation Library v1.0.0 Jul 22, 2024
Copy link

@bloodbare bloodbare left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great Job Oni!

@carlesonielfa carlesonielfa merged commit a1b8e4d into main Jul 23, 2024
1 check passed
@carlesonielfa carlesonielfa deleted the nuclia-eval-v0 branch July 23, 2024 08:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants