Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: add synchronous hooks proposal #198
doc: add synchronous hooks proposal #198
Changes from 1 commit
8f8b3e1
95e449c
7f6d0ac
1a588c8
5259a80
a7fd700
0cd91d9
bcfab66
1c8877e
570dd05
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
format
is required, if we’re copying the existingload
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually this bit seems problematic if we want to delegate ESM detection to the default load - if hooks don't care about the format but simply want to override the loading (e.g. don't load from disk), they need to detect the format themselves, in the absence of
context.format
and call tonextLoad()
. But that's a pre-existing problem.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With format detection, can we make
format
optional, since we will have a source to perform the check on?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternatively if we want to be explicit, perhaps
context.detectFormat(source)
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They not only need to know how to detect the format, but also need to know when the detection is needed (for example, if there is a
--no-detect-format
, they need to take care of it). At that point we might as well just make the format optional, and Node.js will decide whether format detection is needed after the entire load chain finishes, not during any particular load step.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is all unrelated. Basically currently there’s no way for hooks to both transform a file and then have Node run detection on it; that’s perhaps something we want to enable somehow, but how to do so is a separate concern that isn’t very related to moving the hooks to be sync. One obvious way that comes to mind is to just expose the
containsModuleSyntax
method as a helper, that hooks can run themselves to take advantage of Node’s built-in detection ability.But anyway I stand by my comment, that for the moment this is required and there’s a good chance it will remain so.