Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: make minor edits to the Arguments section of the documentation #568

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

nanodino
Copy link
Contributor

@nanodino nanodino commented Jan 7, 2025

I found these somewhat distracting and figured I might as well clean the documentation up a bit:

  • give all arguments the same format
  • correct spelling for separately and yourself
  • remove extra whitespace in sentence

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated README.md formatting for the request() method
    • Enhanced argument descriptions with consistent asterisk styling
    • Improved documentation readability without changing method functionality

- give all arguments the same format
- correct spelling for `separately` and `yourself`
- remove extra whitespace in sentence
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves minor formatting updates to the README.md file for the urllib package, specifically focusing on the documentation for the async request(url[, options]) method. The changes are purely stylistic, involving the consistent application of triple asterisks (***) to argument descriptions to enhance visual clarity and documentation formatting.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Updated formatting for method arguments using triple asterisks, including fixJSONCtlChars, timeout, keepAliveTimeout, formatRedirectUrl, and streaming

Poem

🐰 Docs in code, a rabbit's delight,
Asterisks dancing, formatting just right!
Triple stars shine, making docs gleam,
Clarity blooming like a coder's dream
Markdown magic, oh so neat! 📝✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)

67-67: Fix grammar in the timeout description.

The sentence has a grammatical error in the phrase "same timeout on two phase".

Apply this diff to fix the grammar:

-  - ***timeout*** Number | Array - Request timeout in milliseconds for connecting phase and response receiving phase. Default is `5000`. You can use `timeout: 5000` to tell urllib use same timeout on two phase or set them separately such as `timeout: [3000, 5000]`, which will set connecting timeout to 3s and response 5s.
+  - ***timeout*** Number | Array - Request timeout in milliseconds for connecting phase and response receiving phase. Default is `5000`. You can use `timeout: 5000` to tell urllib to use the same timeout on both phases or set them separately such as `timeout: [3000, 5000]`, which will set connecting timeout to 3s and response 5s.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~67-~67: Possible agreement error. The noun ‘phase’ seems to be countable.
Context: ... to tell urllib use same timeout on two phase or set them separately such as `timeout...

(CD_NN)


74-74: Fix spelling in the beforeRequest description.

The phrase "every thing" should be "everything" as it's used as a single word in this context.

Apply this diff to fix the spelling:

-  - ***beforeRequest*** Function - Before request hook, you can change every thing here.
+  - ***beforeRequest*** Function - Before request hook, you can change everything here.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[misspelling] ~74-~74: Use ‘every thing’ if you want to emphasize that the things are separate. Usually, you can use “everything”.
Context: ...n - Before request hook, you can change every thing here. - streaming Boolean - let...

(EVERYTHING)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2238c1 and b78c4e5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[grammar] ~67-~67: Possible agreement error. The noun ‘phase’ seems to be countable.
Context: ... to tell urllib use same timeout on two phase or set them separately such as `timeout...

(CD_NN)


[misspelling] ~74-~74: Use ‘every thing’ if you want to emphasize that the things are separate. Usually, you can use “everything”.
Context: ...n - Before request hook, you can change every thing here. - streaming Boolean - let...

(EVERYTHING)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
README.md (4)

65-65: LGTM! Consistent formatting applied.

The formatting change to use triple asterisks for the fixJSONCtlChars parameter aligns with the document's style guide.


68-68: LGTM! Consistent formatting applied.

The formatting change to use triple asterisks for the keepAliveTimeout parameter aligns with the document's style guide.


73-73: LGTM! Consistent formatting applied.

The formatting change to use triple asterisks for the formatRedirectUrl parameter aligns with the document's style guide.


75-75: LGTM! Consistent formatting applied.

The formatting change to use triple asterisks for the streaming parameter aligns with the document's style guide.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Open in Stackblitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/node-modules/urllib@568

commit: b78c4e5

@fengmk2 fengmk2 changed the title make minor edits to the Arguments section of the documentation docs: make minor edits to the Arguments section of the documentation Jan 9, 2025
@fengmk2 fengmk2 enabled auto-merge (squash) January 9, 2025 05:03
@fengmk2 fengmk2 disabled auto-merge January 9, 2025 05:18
@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit 1fc07fe into node-modules:master Jan 9, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants