Repository navigation
Record bounded Ofqual Board-minutes author review - #44
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Add the exploratory reassessment and its eight accepted author decisions with personal source review pending. Preserve manuscripts, historical findings, contract and maintenance state; retain the disclosed predeclaration failure. Include supporting source notes, preservation tests and CI checks without authorizing a paper or release.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Records the completed eight-decision author review for the separately bounded Ofqual Board-minutes reassessment. This is an informative research-record addition; it changes no scoring rule or normative contract.
Start with
research/strengthening/solo-002-board-minutes-reassessment/README.md; the exact dispositions are inreview-status.jsonand the inspection limits insource-ledger.md.Verification and evidence boundaries
The exploratory assessment itself remains nonconformant: its result-informed boundary expansion truthfully records
aggregation.predeclared: false, while the unchanged current schema requires true. The preservation check expects and discloses that failure. A passing CI job does not make this assessment conformant.Personal source review, earlier SR review items, comparative adjudication and independent validation remain unresolved. S05 retains its original source boundary; this PR establishes no tie, superiority, time saving or general reliability. Repository sharing was separately authorized after the eight decisions; manuscript revision and scientific-paper publication were not authorized.
Release documentation
HIT remains in v0.6.7 maintenance. This PR is intentionally a draft and is not a request to merge or publish a paper. Hosted validation results are reported separately by the PR checks.