Skip to content

Record bounded Ofqual Board-minutes author review - #44

Merged
mj3b merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/focused-methods-claim-map
Oct 17, 2026
Merged

mj3b merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/focused-methods-claim-map

Conversation

@mj3b

@mj3b mj3b commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What changed

Records the completed eight-decision author review for the separately bounded Ofqual Board-minutes reassessment. This is an informative research-record addition; it changes no scoring rule or normative contract.

  • Adds the fourteen-source ledger, expanded chronology, exploratory proposal snapshot, preservation manifest and exact author receipts.
  • Records Counsel 1 with 2/IE alternatives retained; Judgment, Command, Correction, Repair and Reform 2 with their separate limits. Repair is restricted to the AS/A-level record-correction route. Reform retains the qualification that the Board delegated development of an implementation plan, not approval of a completed plan.
  • Records each integrity component as limited and the derived overall status as limited. All eight bounded author decisions are complete; personal source review remains pending.
  • Includes the supporting claim-planning map, dated Ofqual/related-work source checks and minutes supplement referenced by the packet. These are separate from the unchanged manuscripts.
  • Adds preservation and review-state checks, five regression tests and a CI step. The tests cover approved manifest identity, distinct protected paths, baseline identity and unsupported authority/source-review changes.

Start with research/strengthening/solo-002-board-minutes-reassessment/README.md; the exact dispositions are in review-status.json and the inspection limits in source-ledger.md.

Verification and evidence boundaries

  • All 39 local workflow commands or comparisons passed across the initial run and one targeted rerun. The initial integrity-audit failure came from punctuation in new headings; correcting those headings restored the unchanged historical audit output. No historical audit result was regenerated to hide the failure.
  • The new five-test suite passes, including twelve source-review and authority-change subtests. Preservation checks confirm all 42 protected files and the proposal snapshot are unchanged.
  • Historical records, both manuscripts, the claim register and frozen inputs remain preserved. Local links and staged whitespace checks pass.
  • Software checks, AI-assisted work, author decisions and independent evidence are distinguished. AI-assisted pre-PR review adds no independent human review or source authentication.

The exploratory assessment itself remains nonconformant: its result-informed boundary expansion truthfully records aggregation.predeclared: false, while the unchanged current schema requires true. The preservation check expects and discloses that failure. A passing CI job does not make this assessment conformant.

Personal source review, earlier SR review items, comparative adjudication and independent validation remain unresolved. S05 retains its original source boundary; this PR establishes no tie, superiority, time saving or general reliability. Repository sharing was separately authorized after the eight decisions; manuscript revision and scientific-paper publication were not authorized.

Release documentation

  • The addition is documented under Unreleased in CHANGELOG.md, including what was added and what remains unresolved.
  • No release, tag, archive, DOI update or maturity promotion is claimed. Existing exact-version metadata is unchanged.
  • No v1.0 gate is completed or waived; current-contract external-rater replication and the independent-human implementation audit remain separate obligations.

HIT remains in v0.6.7 maintenance. This PR is intentionally a draft and is not a request to merge or publish a paper. Hosted validation results are reported separately by the PR checks.

Add the exploratory reassessment and its eight accepted author decisions with personal source review pending. Preserve manuscripts, historical findings, contract and maintenance state; retain the disclosed predeclaration failure. Include supporting source notes, preservation tests and CI checks without authorizing a paper or release.
@mj3b
mj3b marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2026 21:29
@mj3b
mj3b merged commit 6e2aabc into main Oct 17, 2026
1 check passed
@mj3b
mj3b deleted the docs/focused-methods-claim-map branch October 17, 2026 21:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant