dev: Move assert in derivation for generated file in the derivation definition #1817
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…efinition If we access the asserts outside the derivation arguments, and inside the code that _creates_ the derivation then we observe IFD in `nix flake show`. This commit fixes it, and allows `nix flake show` to work! Fixes nix-community#1154
GaetanLepage
approved these changes
Jul 5, 2024
|
@Mergifyio queue |
✅ The pull request has been merged automaticallyThe pull request has been merged automatically at 8fbcfcb |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If we access the asserts outside the derivation arguments, and inside the code that creates the derivation then we observe IFD in
nix flake show.This commit fixes it, and allows
nix flake showto work!Fixes #1154