Skip to content

Fixing bugs with Conversation search #4877

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rapterjet2004
Copy link
Contributor

@rapterjet2004 rapterjet2004 commented Apr 15, 2025

Finally replicated the glitch

  • Search for fileTypeExamples
  • it shows up at first, but disappears once I git the 'e'. Might be retrieving the data but overwriting it with the messages when that arrives from the server

🏁 Checklist

  • ⛑️ Tests (unit and/or integration) are included or not needed
  • 🔖 Capability is checked or not needed
  • 🔙 Backport requests are created or not needed: /backport to stable-xx.x
  • 📅 Milestone is set
  • 🌸 PR title is meaningful (if it should be in the changelog: is it meaningful to users?)

@rapterjet2004 rapterjet2004 added the 2. developing Work in progress label Apr 15, 2025
@rapterjet2004 rapterjet2004 self-assigned this Apr 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Codacy

Lint

TypemasterPR
Warnings9897
Errors99

SpotBugs

CategoryBaseNew
Bad practice66
Correctness222118
Dodgy code7171
Internationalization33
Malicious code vulnerability33
Performance44
Security11
Total310206

Copy link
Contributor

APK file: https://www.kaminsky.me/nc-dev/android-artifacts/4877-talk.apk

qrcode

To test this change/fix you can simply download above APK file and install and test it in parallel to your existing Nextcloud Talk app.

@rapterjet2004 rapterjet2004 requested review from mahibi and removed request for mahibi April 17, 2025 17:11
@mahibi
Copy link
Collaborator

mahibi commented May 14, 2025

@rapterjet2004 what the sate of this PR? Asking as it's marked as "developing" and no reviewer is assigned.
Is it still work in progress or should it be reviewed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2. developing Work in progress
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Can't find open conversations
2 participants