Skip to content

Conversation

@rsill-neo4j
Copy link
Contributor

This should be the same as #1391

The changes from #1325 have been incorporated.

I was unable to push to the fork 1391 was created from, that's why i raised a new PR

@Hunterness Hunterness self-assigned this Oct 20, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some of the show constraint command results lost their new columns as the vector constraint rows were added :(

Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comments on the updates

Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Answering the classification questions as well as adding the vector property type constraints to the setup

Co-authored-by: Therese Magnusson <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

More comments on table formatting/alignment

Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No new comments 🎉

Now we just have to keep it up to date while waiting for graph types to go public/GA/beta/what the plan now is

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants