docs: name a corpus a reader can run this validator against - #34
Open
astrogilda wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
astrogilda wants to merge 1 commit into
astrogilda wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Every check type in the README is a claim about what the validator would refuse, and the README gave a reader no way to test that claim. This adds one subsection after Check types naming an external corpus that exercises the same shape of question, says plainly what it does not cover, and states that it is not a conformance requirement here. Nothing else in the diff. Signed-off-by: Sankalp Gilda <sankalp.gilda@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
One subsection after Check types, and nothing else in the diff.
Each check type in that list is a claim about what the validator would refuse. The README gives a reader no way to test the claim. The insertion names one external corpus that exercises the same shape of question. It says plainly what it does not cover, and that it sets no conformance requirement here.
I opened this because you merged the
ledger-anchoringchange on 2026-09-13 and the gap was visible while I was in the file. Close it if you would rather the README not point outward; I will not reopen it.