fix(portal): made an improvement on deploy tips

[xuelianhan007]

Description

Made an improvement on deploy tips

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How This Has Been Tested

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality)
• CI/CD or documentation update (changes to CI/CD pipeline or documentation)

Self Checklist

• I ensured that I are not pushing configuration files containing sensitive information such as testing keys.
• I ensured that large PR is avoided, Consider splitting if there are more than 500 line changes, In addition to line count, also consider the number of files being affected, An ideal amount is less than 10, 25-30 is generally too large with the exception of library upgrades, refactors, etc.
• I ensured that If the PR is inevitably large, a short PR review meeting or discuss with reviewers will be organized.
• I ensured that If the PR is to resolve a blocker, do not make unrelated changes in the same PR e.g. formatting changes, to minimize review time.
• I ensured that PR is focused
• I ensured that context was given in the PR description, Include a clear description of the changes
• I ensured that related github issues are linked, Include screenshots if this will make the context clearer for the reviewer
• I ensured that "work in progress" or "hold" labels are removed
• I ensured that adherence to style guidelines
• I ensured that feature flag is applied if needed
• I ensured that follow secure development practices
• I ensured that no secrets or sensitive data have been committed or logged
• I ensured that no hardcoded values that may change depending on environment (these should be configured dynamically e.g. through environment variables, from the db etc)

[github-actions]

Library Vulnerability scan results

The following vulnerabilities have been found in libraries included in the repository (some might be dependencies of dependencies).

Critical 🔴 and High 🟡 severity vulnerabilities must be fixed before the PR can be merged, even if they are dependencies of dependencies.

Library	Vulnerable version	Severity	Fix version	Vulnerability ID
spring-web	6.1.14	Medium	6.1.21	GHSA-6r3c-xf4w-jxjm
nimbus-jose-jwt	9.37.3	Medium	9.37.4	GHSA-xwmg-2g98-w7v9
commons-lang3	3.14.0	Medium	3.18.0	GHSA-j288-q9x7-2f5v
esbuild	0.24.2	Medium	0.25.0	GHSA-67mh-4wv8-2f99

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed for 'kraken_nodejs'

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed for 'kraken_java'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud