Skip to content

fix(autopilots): clarify Chinese schedule day-pattern labels (MUL-4927)#5576

Merged
Bohan-J merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
agent/j/6dc45f5b
Jul 17, 2026
Merged

fix(autopilots): clarify Chinese schedule day-pattern labels (MUL-4927)#5576
Bohan-J merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
agent/j/6dc45f5b

Conversation

@Bohan-J

@Bohan-J Bohan-J commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Improves the Chinese wording of the autopilot schedule editor's day-pattern selector (from #5457). The previous copy was semantically vague:

  • Field label 日子 was colloquial and unclear.
  • Option 按星期 ("by week") was hard to understand.

New wording aligns with how iOS/Google/飞书 calendars label recurrence in Chinese, and keeps the option set short and parallel:

key before after EN source
schedule_editor.days_label 日子 重复 Days
schedule_editor.days_every 每天 每天 (unchanged) Every day
schedule_editor.days_weekly 按星期 每周 Days of week
schedule_editor.days_monthly 按日期 每月 Day of month
schedule_editor.a11y.day_pattern 日期方式 重复方式 Day pattern

每周 reveals the weekday chips and 每月 reveals the day-of-month field, so the short labels stay unambiguous in context. Only zh-Hans values changed; keys are untouched.

Testing

  • zh-Hans/autopilots.json validated as well-formed JSON.
  • Replicated the parity.test.ts key-parity check between en and zh-Hans autopilots bundles (348 keys each, no missing/extra) — value-only edits keep parity intact.

Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
multica-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 17, 2026 9:12am

Request Review

… (MUL-4927)

Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai>
@Bohan-J
Bohan-J merged commit 28969a8 into main Jul 17, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant