Skip to content

Conversation

@msalsouri
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@msalsouri msalsouri self-assigned this Oct 30, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @msalsouri, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow designed to automate the lifecycle management of Azure environments directly from pull requests. By leveraging specific labels, developers can now effortlessly provision temporary Azure resources for testing and development, and subsequently dismantle them, thereby streamlining the development process and ensuring efficient resource utilization.

Highlights

  • New GitHub Actions Workflow: A new workflow file, 'spinup-destroy.yml', has been added to automate Azure environment management.
  • Label-Triggered Automation: The workflow is configured to trigger based on specific pull request labels: 'spin up environment' to provision resources and 'destroy environment' to tear them down.
  • Azure Environment Provisioning: The 'setup-up-azure-resources' job creates an Azure resource group, app service plan, and a web app, then configures it to use GitHub Container Registry (GHCR).
  • Azure Environment Teardown: The 'destroy-azure-resources' job is responsible for deleting the entire Azure resource group, ensuring clean-up of provisioned resources.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request adds a new workflow file spinup-destroy.yml to configure and destroy Azure resources based on pull request labels. The workflow includes jobs for setting up Azure resources (creating resource group, app service plan, and webapp) and destroying them. The workflow is triggered when a pull request is labeled with 'spin up environment' or 'destroy environment'. I have identified a potential issue with the hardcoded username in the AZURE_WEBAPP_NAME environment variable, which could lead to naming conflicts.

###############################################
### Replace <username> with GitHub username ###
###############################################
AZURE_WEBAPP_NAME: <username>-ttt-app

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The AZURE_WEBAPP_NAME includes a hardcoded <username> placeholder. This will likely cause naming conflicts when multiple users try to spin up environments. Consider using a more unique identifier, such as the GitHub user's ID or the pull request number, to ensure unique web app names. This is a critical issue because it prevents the workflow from functioning correctly in a multi-user environment.

I suggest using the GitHub user's ID or the pull request number in combination with the username to ensure uniqueness. For example, you could use ${{ github.actor }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}-ttt-app.

AZURE_WEBAPP_NAME: ${{ github.actor }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}-ttt-app

IMAGE_REGISTRY_URL: ghcr.io
AZURE_RESOURCE_GROUP: cd-with-actions
AZURE_APP_PLAN: actions-ttt-deployment
AZURE_LOCATION: '"East US"'

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The AZURE_LOCATION is hardcoded as '"East US"'. While this works, it might be beneficial to allow users to configure this via a repository secret or workflow input. This would provide more flexibility and allow the workflow to be used in different Azure regions. Consider making this configurable.

AZURE_LOCATION: ${{ secrets.AZURE_LOCATION || '"East US"' }}

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +18 to +21
setup-up-azure-resources:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'spin up environment')
steps:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Gate setup job on the label that triggered the event

The workflow fires on every pull_request "labeled" event, but the job condition checks contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'spin up environment'). After a PR receives the spin up environment label, any subsequent label addition (including adding destroy environment) still satisfies this predicate and reruns the provisioning job, racing with the destroy job or repeatedly recreating the same infrastructure. The condition should compare against github.event.label.name (or similar) so the job runs only when that specific label is added.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants