feat: add raw route #11
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request updates dependency resolution and API routing. An override is added in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant C as Client
participant A as App (index.ts)
participant VRaw as V1_RAW_ROUTER
participant VM as versionMiddleware
C->>A: Request "/api/v1/raw/:version"
A->>VRaw: Forward request to raw router
VRaw->>VM: Invoke versionMiddleware
VM-->>VRaw: Process version parameter
VRaw-->>A: Return API response
A-->>C: Deliver response
Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/middlewares/version.ts (1)
25-25: Consider implementing the caching mechanism mentioned in the TODO.There's an existing TODO comment about caching available versions for a certain period. This could be an important optimization if
getAvailableVersions()is an expensive operation (e.g., if it makes network requests or reads from disk).Would you like me to suggest an implementation for caching the available versions with an appropriate expiration strategy?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
package.json(1 hunks)src/index.ts(1 hunks)src/middlewares/version.ts(1 hunks)src/routes/v1_categories.openapi.ts(1 hunks)src/routes/v1_raw/index.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/index.ts (2)
10-10: LGTM - Router import added correctlyThe import for the new
V1_RAW_ROUTERis appropriately added.
17-17: LGTM - Router registration properly implementedThe new router is correctly registered with the app. This follows the same pattern as the other routers in the application.
package.json (1)
40-42:✅ Verification successful
Verify the reason for pinning jsonpath-plus version
Adding an override for
jsonpath-plusto version10.3.0is a good practice for dependency management, but it's useful to verify why this specific version is needed.
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest version of jsonpath-plus and are there any known issues with it?💡 Result:
The latest version of
jsonpath-plusis 10.3.0, released in February 2025[4][6]. This version addresses critical security vulnerabilities present in earlier releases. Below is a detailed overview:
Key Security Vulnerabilities
1. Remote Code Execution (RCE) - CVE-2024-21534
- Affected versions: All versions before 10.0.7 (released October 2024)[2][8].
- Root cause: Improper input sanitization in the
eval="safe"mode allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted JSONPath expressions[2][8].- Fix: Patched in 10.0.7 by improving input validation and sanitization[2].
2. Follow-up RCE - CVE-2025-1302
- Affected versions: Versions before 10.3.0[4].
- Root cause: An incomplete fix for CVE-2024-21534 left a loophole in the sanitization logic[4].
- Fix: Fully resolved in 10.3.0 with stricter input checks and updated sandboxing[4].
Other Known Issues
Syntax Limitations:
- Difficulty selecting properties containing square brackets (e.g.,
$..['property[1]']) due to parsing conflicts[10].- Challenges with numeric keys (e.g.,
$..['123key']) in certain contexts[10].Documentation Gaps:
- GitHub Pages documentation returns 404 errors for some paths[10].
- Feature requests for RFC 9535 compliance and syntax enhancements remain open[10].
Recommendations
- Upgrade to 10.3.0 to mitigate RCE risks.
- Avoid using unsupported versions (e.g., ≤10.0.6 or <10.3.0).
- Review open issues on the GitHub repository for ongoing development updates[10].
Citations:
- 1: https://github.com/JSONPath-Plus/JSONPath/releases
- 2: https://vulners.com/github/GHSA-PPPG-CPFQ-H7WR
- 3: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@types/jsonpath-plus
- 4: GHSA-hw8r-x6gr-5gjp
- 5: https://classic.yarnpkg.com/en/package/jsonpath-plus
- 6: https://www.npmjs.com/package/jsonpath-plus/v/10.0.0
- 7: https://jsonpath-plus.github.io/JSONPath/docs/ts/
- 8: https://medium.verylazytech.com/poc-cve-2024-21534-jsonpath-plus-vulnerable-to-remote-code-execution-rce-due-to-improper-input-a466ae69aa92
- 9: https://www.versio.io/product-release-end-of-life-eol-JSONPath%20Plus-Stefan%20Goessner.html
- 10: https://github.com/JSONPath-Plus/JSONPath/issues
Security Dependency Confirmation
The web query confirms that version 10.3.0 is the latest release ofjsonpath-plusand it specifically addresses critical security vulnerabilities (CVE-2024-21534 and CVE-2025-1302). Pinning to this version in the overrides is deliberate to mitigate these known issues.
- Confirmed: The override for
"jsonpath-plus": "10.3.0"is necessary.- Rationale: This version fixes previous vulnerabilities and is the most secure release available as of February 2025.
src/routes/v1_categories.openapi.ts (1)
2-2: LGTM - Good refactoring to centralize version parameter definitionThe import of
VERSION_PATH_PARAMETERfrom a centralized location is a good refactoring that improves code maintainability and consistency across routes.src/middlewares/version.ts (2)
6-15: Good addition for standardizing OpenAPI parameters across routes.The introduction of
VERSION_PATH_PARAMETERas a shared constant is a good practice for maintaining consistency in API documentation. This will ensure that the version parameter is defined uniformly across different routes, reducing duplication and potential inconsistencies.The constant is well-structured with proper TypeScript type assertions and includes comprehensive documentation properties that will be valuable for both API consumers and developers.
6-15:✅ Verification successful
Verify consistent access to version parameter throughout the API.
The middleware accesses the version parameter using
c.req.param("version"), which aligns with thename: "version"in the newVERSION_PATH_PARAMETERconstant. It's good practice to maintain this consistency between documentation and implementation.Also applies to: 17-46
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all occurrences of accessing the version parameter # to ensure consistency across the codebase echo "Checking for version parameter access patterns:" rg 'req\.param\("version"\)' --type ts echo "Checking for other route definitions using version parameter:" rg 'VERSION_PATH_PARAMETER' --type tsLength of output: 821
Version parameter usage is consistent throughout the API.
The search confirms that the middleware insrc/middlewares/version.tsusesc.req.param("version")and that this usage is echoed in other route files (e.g.,src/routes/v1_categories.ts). The constantVERSION_PATH_PARAMETERcorrectly labels the parameter as"version", and it’s imported appropriately in the OpenAPI documentation (src/routes/v1_categories.openapi.ts). No modifications are needed.
| export const V1_RAW_ROUTER = new OpenAPIHono<HonoContext>().basePath("/api/v1/raw/:version"); | ||
|
|
||
| V1_RAW_ROUTER.use(versionMiddleware); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Router is defined but lacks route handlers
The V1_RAW_ROUTER is correctly set up with a base path and middleware, but there are no actual route handlers defined. This means the /api/v1/raw/:version endpoint won't handle any specific requests yet.
Consider adding route handlers to make this router functional, for example:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any route handlers defined for this router in other files
find src -type f -name "*.ts" -exec grep -l "V1_RAW_ROUTER\.(get\|post\|put\|delete\|patch)" {} \;Length of output: 103
I'm going to run an additional search to verify if any route handlers are defined for V1_RAW_ROUTER. Please run the script below and share its output so we can conclusively determine if the router remains unused for specific HTTP methods.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
echo "Searching for route handler definitions associated with V1_RAW_ROUTER:"
rg -n "V1_RAW_ROUTER\.(get|post|put|delete|patch)" srcLength of output: 207
Missing Route Handlers on V1_RAW_ROUTER
After verifying the codebase, it’s clear that while the router is correctly configured with a base path and middleware, there are no HTTP method handlers attached (e.g., GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, or PATCH). This means that the /api/v1/raw/:version endpoint isn’t currently set up to handle any requests.
- File:
src/routes/v1_raw/index.ts(lines 5–7) - Issue: No route handlers are defined on the
V1_RAW_ROUTER - Suggestion: Add the necessary route handlers or, if the router is intended as a placeholder, document that the endpoints are pending implementation.
fixes #10
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor