feat: add preliminary tadoX support

[mattdavis90]

This PR adds preliminary support for TadoX based on this Python library

It doesn't attempt to guard against using older v2 APIs - I'm not sure whether they'll respond.

Also, the typing could be totally wrong on the responses, I've assumed that they're the same as the v2 responses.

[mattdavis90]

@abn Here's what I have so far for TadoX support

[abn]

One comment/question.

Also ugg. I really wish tado can get their act together when it comes to apis. It just feels like every feature is developed in isolation by a brand new team without any access to existing features. 😮‍💨

[mattdavis90]

One comment/question.

Also ugg. I really wish tado can get their act together when it comes to apis. It just feels like every feature is developed in isolation by a brand new team without any access to existing features. 😮‍💨

Right! I thought they'd started getting their act together just before the EnergyIQ stuff was added, then that was a total mess, now this. There's absolutely no consistency.

[mattdavis90]

I've pushed more updates to the typing based on @jm-duke feedback and I've tweaked the code for manualControl to hopefully work with TadoX - I hadn't fully appreciated the change from

{ "temperature": { "celsius": 18 } }

to

{ "temperature": { "value": 18 } }

clearly not catering for the North American market anymore 😅

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in Stackblitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/mattdavis90/node-tado-client@90

commit: 1c30675