Skip to content

Conversation

@kurtseifried
Copy link

Synch upstream with downstream fork as per email thread.

kenhuangus and others added 8 commits August 30, 2025 12:49
- Add proper TypeScript types for jsPDF text options in page.tsx
- Fix LayerStatus type inference issue with const assertion
- Remove unused import of LayerData in generate-executive-summary.ts
- Remove unused mermaid import in page.tsx
- Fix React unescaped entities warning
- Add ESLint configuration for Next.js
## Summary
Implemented a robust error handling system and testing infrastructure for MAESTRO, providing enterprise-grade reliability and maintainability.

## Changes

### Error Handling System
- Added typed error system with MaestroError class and error codes
- Implemented React Error Boundary for global error catching
- Created user-friendly error display component with recovery actions
- Built AI-specific error handler for Genkit flow failures
- Added retry mechanisms with exponential backoff and jitter

### Testing Infrastructure
- Set up Vitest with React Testing Library
- Created comprehensive test suites for all error utilities
- Added test scripts for running, coverage, and UI testing
- Configured TypeScript support for test globals

### Integration Improvements
- Enhanced all server actions with error handling and retry logic
- Non-breaking integration maintaining existing functionality
- Added contextual error information for better debugging
- Updated .gitignore to exclude AI development tools

## Technical Details
- All tests passing (26 tests across 4 test suites)
- TypeScript strict mode compliant
- ESLint validated
- Production build successful

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
feat: Comprehensive Error Handling & Testing Infrastructure
fix: improve code quality with type safety and linting fixes
feat: Add Comprehensive Error Handling & Testing Infrastructure
@mathhelp888-lab mathhelp888-lab self-assigned this Oct 4, 2025
@mathhelp888-lab mathhelp888-lab self-requested a review October 4, 2025 03:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants