Skip to content

Conversation

@Moises-S001
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Great job on implementing the core logic correctly and ensuring the original state is not mutated! However, this submission requires a couple of changes to meet the task's specific constraints. The implementation in src/transformStateWithClones.js uses an if-else if chain, but the task explicitly requires a switch statement to handle the different action types [CHECKLIST ITEM #2]. Furthermore, this switch statement must include a default case to handle any unknown actions, which is currently missing [CHECKLIST ITEM #3]. Please refactor your conditional logic to use a switch with a default case.


✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Important

Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.

Tip

If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.

Caution

Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.

Footnotes

  1. Rate AI review example

  2. Re-request AI review example

  3. Add AI review comments example

Comment on lines 14 to 22
if (action.type === 'addProperties') {
Object.assign(currentState, action.extraData);
} else if (action.type === 'removeProperties') {
for (const key of action.keysToRemove) {
delete currentState[key];
}
} else if (action.type === 'clear') {
currentState = {};
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This if-else if chain should be refactored into a switch statement as required by the task. This violates checklist item #2: 'Use switch statement if you have limited amount of conditions.' Additionally, a switch statement must include a default case for handling unknown action types, which is also missing (violates checklist item #3).

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Great job refactoring the logic to use a switch statement! The core functionality is working correctly. However, changes are needed because a key requirement is missing.

Your switch statement in src/transformStateWithClones.js must include a default case to handle unknown action types. This is a mandatory part of the error handling for this task. [CHECKLIST ITEM #3]

Once you add the default case, this should be ready for approval. Keep up the great work!


✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Important

Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.

Tip

If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.

Caution

Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.

Footnotes

  1. Rate AI review example

  2. Re-request AI review example

  3. Add AI review comments example

Comment on lines 14 to 28
switch (action.type) {
case 'addProperties':
Object.assign(currentState, action.extraData);
break;

case 'removeProperties':
for (const key of action.keysToRemove) {
delete currentState[key];
}
break;

case 'clear':
currentState = {};
break;
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This switch statement is missing a default case. According to the requirements, a default case should be included for error handling. This violates checklist item #3: 'switch/case should always have default case for error handling.'

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Great job adding the default case to your switch statement! You're very close to a perfect solution. I am approving this submission as an educational override to help you move forward, but there's one important correction to make.

Your default case currently has a return statement, which causes the function to exit immediately with a string. The function must always return an array of objects. To fix this, you should replace return 'Erro'; with break;. This will correctly ignore the unknown action and allow the loop to continue, pushing the unmodified state to the results array for that step.


✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Footnotes

  1. Rate AI review example

currentState = {};
break;
default:
return 'Erro';

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This return statement causes the function to exit immediately with a string value. However, the function is documented to return an array of objects (Object[]), so returning a string here is incorrect.

For an unknown action type, the function should probably ignore it and continue processing the rest of the actions. A break statement would be more appropriate here to achieve that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants