made task #5234
made task #5234
Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great job on implementing the core logic for the state transformation and correctly handling immutability! Your code works as expected.
However, I am requesting changes because the implementation violates a couple of specific requirements from the checklist. In src/transformStateWithClones.js, you've used a series of if statements, but the task requires a switch statement to handle the different action types [CHECKLIST ITEM #2]. Additionally, the switch statement must include a default case to handle any unknown actions for better error handling [CHECKLIST ITEM #3].
Please refactor your conditional logic to meet these requirements.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
src/transformStateWithClones.js
Outdated
| if (action.type === 'addProperties') { | ||
| Object.assign(nextState, action.extraData); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (action.type === 'removeProperties') { | ||
| for (const key of action.keysToRemove) { | ||
| delete nextState[key]; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (action.type === 'clear') { | ||
| nextState = {}; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This implementation with multiple if statements violates the requirements. According to the checklist:
- Checklist item sol #2: 'Use switch statement if you have limited amount of conditions.' You should refactor this logic to use a
switchstatement. - Checklist item Kisilov_Vadim #3: 'switch/case should always have default case for error handling.' A
switchstatement would also allow you to add adefaultcase to handle any unknown action types.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry, the pull request review was unsuccessful for the following reasons:
Warning
No changes were made in the pull request since the last review. Please make sure that you have added files to the pull request and committed the changes.
[CODE: NCM]
If the issue is within your control, please address it.
The next review attempt will automatically launch in about 1 hour.
If you believe this is an error or need assistance, please contact the support team.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Excellent work on this iteration! I am happy to approve your solution. You've successfully refactored the code to use a switch statement and included a default case, which addresses the previous feedback perfectly. The implementation is now clean, correct, and meets all the requirements of the task. Keep up the great work!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.