Skip to content

Solution for splitInteger#912

Open
nastushka-oct wants to merge 1 commit into
mate-academy:mainfrom
nastushka-oct:main
Open

Solution for splitInteger#912
nastushka-oct wants to merge 1 commit into
mate-academy:mainfrom
nastushka-oct:main

Conversation

@nastushka-oct

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I did it after all! Now we'll find out if it was right...

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Great job! 🎉 Your implementation meets all the core requirements of the task, including sorting the output array in ascending order, which is explicitly required by the task description. The logic for distributing the integer parts is correct, and there are no critical issues. Keep up the good work! If you work on similar tasks in the future, always double-check the requirements regarding output order, but in this case, your solution is spot on. 👍


✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Footnotes

  1. Rate AI review example

Comment thread splitInteger.js
const result = new Array(numberOfParts - remainder).fill(base);
result.push(...new Array(remainder).fill(base + 1));

return result.sort((a, b) => a - b);

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Issue: The result is always sorted in ascending order before being returned. Unless the task or checklist explicitly requires the output to be sorted, this may be incorrect. Typically, the larger parts (base+1) should come first, followed by the smaller parts (base), preserving the original distribution order. Please verify the requirements and remove the .sort((a, b) => a - b) if sorting is not needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants