-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 370
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix display of env activation message and co #3715
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
// Print activation message only if the environment is freshly created | ||
if (create_env) | ||
{ | ||
print_activation_message(ctx); | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Currently the message is shown for installations and updates if the target prefix is different than the currently activated one. Should we preserve this behavior?
Also, should the message rather be printer after the call to install_for_other_pkgmgr
(namely just before the else
)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Currently the message is shown for installations and updates if the target prefix is different than the currently activated one. Should we preserve this behavior?
Indeed, and I was going to keep it that way but I realized conda
was only showing activation message with environment creation, and that actually makes more sense and is less verbose (recommending env activation sounds relevant when the user creates a new environment but seems redundant when installing/updating).
For now, I suggest to do it this way, and if we want to restore the previous behavior, that should be straightforward by adding print_activation_message
where needed.
Also, should the message rather be printer after the call to
install_for_other_pkgmgr
(namely just before theelse
)?
Good question! I put it right after the transaction execution to preserve the order of printing messages (since it was inside Transaction::execute()
). But that could be discussed: either consider that the transaction is finished and print the activation message, and then handle pip
packages (or anything else?) considering we do not recommend it (cf. warning that we added recently) or print the activation message after everything is done including things we don't really approve.
Note however that install_for_other_pkgmgr
does not involve Transaction
so it's supposed to be done with before handling other pkg managers.
In my opinion, let's keep it as it is.
// Print activation message only if the environment is freshly created | ||
if (create_env) | ||
{ | ||
print_activation_message(ctx); | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same suggestions as above.
Side-note: are there a way we could factor (parts of) install_explicit_with_transaction
and install_specs_impl
in another PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Side-note: are there a way we could factor (parts of)
install_explicit_with_transaction
andinstall_specs_impl
in another PR?
Depends on what we want to refactor and if we need some parts in the codebase reworked first. But we can look into it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you, @Hind-M.
mamba env remove
#3712conda
).