Update license field to use proper SPDX identifier #394
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This changes the license field to be a valid [SPDX identifier](https://spdx.org/licenses) aligning with [PEP 639](https://peps.python.org/pep-0639/#project-source-metadata). This populates the `license_expression` field in the PyPI API and is used by downstream tools including deps.dev This PR was generated by Claude after reviewing the license and manifest files in your repository, but opened and reviewed by me. Please let me know if the analysis is incorrect and thanks for being an OSS maintainer.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This changes the license field to be a valid SPDX identifier aligning with PEP 639. This populates the
license_expressionfield in the PyPI API and is used by downstream tools including deps.devThis PR was generated by Claude after reviewing the license and manifest files in your repository, but opened and reviewed by me. Please let me know if the analysis is incorrect and thanks for being an OSS maintainer.