Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚡️ Avoid blocking request when sending new participant notification #1538

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

lukevella
Copy link
Owner

@lukevella lukevella commented Jan 31, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced participant notification system for polls
    • Added email notifications for new poll participants
  • Improvements

    • Streamlined email notification process
    • Improved modularity of participant tracking mechanism

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 31, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
app ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 31, 2025 10:42am
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
landing ⬜️ Skipped (Inspect) Jan 31, 2025 10:42am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@lukevella has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ebbcb46 and 73d17c2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/trpc/routers/polls/participants.ts (3 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new asynchronous function sendNewParticipantNotifcationEmail in the participants router for handling email notifications when a new participant is added to a poll. The function centralizes the process of retrieving poll watchers and sending email notifications, replacing the previous inline implementation. The email sending process is now more modular and is executed using a waitUntil mechanism to ensure proper completion.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/web/src/trpc/routers/polls/participants.ts Added new sendNewParticipantNotifcationEmail function for sending participant notification emails, replacing previous inline logic.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Router
    participant NotificationFunc
    participant EmailClient
    participant Database

    Router->>NotificationFunc: Call with pollId, pollTitle, participantName
    NotificationFunc->>Database: Retrieve poll watchers
    Database-->>NotificationFunc: Return watcher list
    NotificationFunc->>EmailClient: Construct and send emails
    EmailClient-->>NotificationFunc: Confirm email sending
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • 🐛 Fix update participant votes #1481: The changes in this PR enhance the email notification system for new participants and watchers, which is directly related to the new sendNewParticipantNotifcationEmail function introduced in the main PR.

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of emails bright,
Notifications sent with coding might.
Watchers alerted, messages clear,
New participants bring such cheer!
Modularity hops with glee 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/src/trpc/routers/polls/participants.ts (2)

20-28: Fix typo in function name.

The function name has a typo: "Notifcation" should be "Notification".

-async function sendNewParticipantNotifcationEmail({
+async function sendNewParticipantNotificationEmail({

29-44: Add pagination to watchers query.

The watchers query should be paginated to avoid potential memory issues with large result sets.

   const watchers = await prisma.watcher.findMany({
     where: {
       pollId,
     },
+    take: 100, // Process in batches of 100
     select: {
       id: true,
       userId: true,
       user: {
         select: {
           email: true,
           name: true,
           locale: true,
         },
       },
     },
   });
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7de0d5b and f666956.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/trpc/routers/polls/participants.ts (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Unit tests
  • GitHub Check: Linting
  • GitHub Check: Type check
  • GitHub Check: Integration tests
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/web/src/trpc/routers/polls/participants.ts (2)

199-205: LGTM! Good use of background processing.

The implementation correctly uses waitUntil to handle notifications asynchronously without blocking the response.


4-4: Verify email client configuration.

The imports look good. Since we're using waitUntil for background processing and getEmailClient for notifications, ensure that:

  1. The email client is properly configured for the production environment
  2. The background tasks complete within the serverless function timeout

Also applies to: 7-7

✅ Verification successful

Email client and templates are properly configured

The email system is properly set up with:

  • Templates in packages/emails/src/templates/
  • Full i18n support in packages/emails/locales/
  • Preview system for testing
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check email client configuration and related files

# Check for email client configuration
rg -A 5 "getEmailClient"

# Check for email templates
fd "NewParticipantEmail.tsx" -x cat
fd "NewParticipantConfirmationEmail.tsx" -x cat

Length of output: 9528


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for email templates and configuration
# Look for React email templates in various locations
fd -e tsx -e ts -e jsx -e js "email" --type f

# Check for email-related configuration files
fd -g "*email*" --type f

# Search for specific template references
rg -l "NewParticipantEmail" 
rg -l "NewParticipantConfirmationEmail"

Length of output: 2593

Comment on lines 46 to 64
for (const watcher of watchers) {
const email = watcher.user.email;
const watcherLocale = watcher.user.locale ?? undefined;
const token = await createToken<DisableNotificationsPayload>(
{ watcherId: watcher.id, pollId },
{ ttl: 0 },
);
getEmailClient(watcherLocale).queueTemplate("NewParticipantEmail", {
to: email,
props: {
participantName,
pollUrl: absoluteUrl(`/poll/${pollId}`),
disableNotificationsUrl: absoluteUrl(
`/api/notifications/unsubscribe?token=${token}`,
),
title: pollTitle,
},
});
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling and parallel processing for email sending.

The current implementation:

  1. Lacks error handling for email sending
  2. Processes emails sequentially which could be slow for many watchers
-  for (const watcher of watchers) {
+  await Promise.all(watchers.map(async (watcher) => {
+    try {
       const email = watcher.user.email;
       const watcherLocale = watcher.user.locale ?? undefined;
       const token = await createToken<DisableNotificationsPayload>(
         { watcherId: watcher.id, pollId },
         { ttl: 0 },
       );
       getEmailClient(watcherLocale).queueTemplate("NewParticipantEmail", {
         to: email,
         props: {
           participantName,
           pollUrl: absoluteUrl(`/poll/${pollId}`),
           disableNotificationsUrl: absoluteUrl(
             `/api/notifications/unsubscribe?token=${token}`,
           ),
           title: pollTitle,
         },
       });
+    } catch (error) {
+      console.error(
+        `Failed to send notification to ${watcher.user.email}:`,
+        error
+      );
+    }
+  }));
-  }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
for (const watcher of watchers) {
const email = watcher.user.email;
const watcherLocale = watcher.user.locale ?? undefined;
const token = await createToken<DisableNotificationsPayload>(
{ watcherId: watcher.id, pollId },
{ ttl: 0 },
);
getEmailClient(watcherLocale).queueTemplate("NewParticipantEmail", {
to: email,
props: {
participantName,
pollUrl: absoluteUrl(`/poll/${pollId}`),
disableNotificationsUrl: absoluteUrl(
`/api/notifications/unsubscribe?token=${token}`,
),
title: pollTitle,
},
});
}
await Promise.all(watchers.map(async (watcher) => {
try {
const email = watcher.user.email;
const watcherLocale = watcher.user.locale ?? undefined;
const token = await createToken<DisableNotificationsPayload>(
{ watcherId: watcher.id, pollId },
{ ttl: 0 },
);
getEmailClient(watcherLocale).queueTemplate("NewParticipantEmail", {
to: email,
props: {
participantName,
pollUrl: absoluteUrl(`/poll/${pollId}`),
disableNotificationsUrl: absoluteUrl(
`/api/notifications/unsubscribe?token=${token}`,
),
title: pollTitle,
},
});
} catch (error) {
console.error(
`Failed to send notification to ${watcher.user.email}:`,
error
);
}
}));

@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – landing January 31, 2025 10:34 Inactive
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/src/trpc/routers/polls/participants.ts (1)

21-21: Fix typo in function name.

The function name has a typo: "Notifcation" should be "Notification".

-async function sendNewParticipantNotifcationEmail({
+async function sendNewParticipantNotificationEmail({
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f666956 and ebbcb46.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/trpc/routers/polls/participants.ts (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Unit tests
  • GitHub Check: Integration tests
  • GitHub Check: Linting
  • GitHub Check: Type check
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/web/src/trpc/routers/polls/participants.ts (3)

3-3: LGTM! Good choice of dependencies.

The addition of Sentry for error tracking and waitUntil for non-blocking operations aligns well with the PR's objective.

Also applies to: 5-5


47-69: Consider using parallel processing for better performance.

The current sequential email processing could be slow when there are many watchers. Consider using Promise.all for parallel processing.

-  for (const watcher of watchers) {
+  await Promise.all(watchers.map(async (watcher) => {
     try {
       const email = watcher.user.email;
       const watcherLocale = watcher.user.locale ?? undefined;
       const token = await createToken<DisableNotificationsPayload>(
         { watcherId: watcher.id, pollId },
         { ttl: 0 },
       );
       getEmailClient(watcherLocale).queueTemplate("NewParticipantEmail", {
         to: email,
         props: {
           participantName,
           pollUrl: absoluteUrl(`/poll/${pollId}`),
           disableNotificationsUrl: absoluteUrl(
             `/api/notifications/unsubscribe?token=${token}`,
           ),
           title: pollTitle,
         },
       });
     } catch (err) {
       Sentry.captureException(err);
     }
-  }
+  }));

204-210: LGTM! Good implementation of non-blocking notifications.

The use of waitUntil effectively achieves the PR's objective of avoiding blocking requests when sending notifications, while ensuring the notification task completes.

@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – landing January 31, 2025 10:37 Inactive
@lukevella lukevella merged commit 0ac1d06 into main Jan 31, 2025
10 checks passed
@lukevella lukevella deleted the new-participant-notification branch January 31, 2025 10:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant