Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 1, 2021. It is now read-only.

Commit

Permalink
new version
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
@gabrielfalcao
gabrielfalcao committed Oct 27, 2009
1 parent f76e5be commit b8f6bb7
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletion.
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions debian/changelog
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
python-staticgenerator (1.4.1) experimental; urgency=low

* New upstream release

-- Gabriel Falcão Gonçalves de Moura <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:03:49 -0200

python-staticgenerator (1.3.6) experimental; urgency=low

* New upstream release
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion setup.py
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
from distutils.core import setup

version = '1.3.4'
version = '1.4.1'

setup(name='staticgenerator',
version=version,
Expand Down

2 comments on commit b8f6bb7

@svetlyak40wt
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why to bother with such kind of static generation if you could just cache whole views in Django?

@lucky
Copy link
Owner

@lucky lucky commented on b8f6bb7 Feb 4, 2011

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Django introduces overhead. If you were to use Nginx in front of Django and Nginx could simply use sendfile(2) then you have a dramatic speed increase.

As you can see on the graph on this page with Django's cache I was able to get up to 500 requests per second. With a static file that number increased to 7,000 requests per second.

Please sign in to comment.