Skip to content

DevOps Challenge: Trigger challenge assessment #291

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 47 commits into from
Mar 25, 2025

Conversation

mathildeshagl
Copy link
Contributor

@mathildeshagl mathildeshagl commented Mar 18, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Launched an interactive DevOps Challenge interface where users can trigger assessments, view real-time feedback with status icons, and create repositories using a guided GitHub username prompt.
  • Refactor
    • Streamlined navigation by removing the legacy GitHub page and its sidebar entry, now ensuring access based on defined user roles.

@mathildeshagl mathildeshagl linked an issue Mar 18, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to In Review in PROMPT Mar 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request adjusts the routing and sidebar configuration by removing the GitHub-related pages and updating the Overview route to feature a new DevOps Challenge page. It introduces several new components, hooks, and network functions to support an enhanced DevOps challenge workflow, including repository creation and assessment functionality. Additionally, related environment configurations and a new Axios instance are added to manage API communications and state via a Zustand store.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
clients/devops_challenge_component/routes/index.tsx
clients/devops_challenge_component/sidebar/index.tsx
Removed GitHub route and sidebar item; updated Overview route to render DevOpsChallengeDataShell with new permission requirements.
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/GitHub/GitHubPage.tsx Removed the GitHubPage component.
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/Overview/OverviewPage.tsx Updated OverviewPage component with new state management and assessment workflow; changed export style.
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/createRepository.ts Added new asynchronous function createRepository for creating a repository via POST requests.
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx
Added new components for managing assessment UI and GitHub username input for repository creation.
.github/workflows/deploy-docker.yml
clients/core/public/env.js
clients/core/public/env.template.js
clients/shared_library/env.ts
Added new environment variable DEV_OPS_CHALLENGE_HOST to deployment and environment configuration files.
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/DevOpsChallengeDataShell.tsx
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/DevOpsChallengePage.tsx
Introduced new container and page components to encapsulate the DevOps challenge logic and UI.
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/DeveloperProfile.ts Introduced a new TypeScript type DeveloperProfile with optional properties for repository assessment data.
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/devOpsChallengeServerConfig.ts Added a new Axios instance configuration and the Patch interface to facilitate API calls.
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/queries/getDeveloperProfile.ts Added a new asynchronous function getDeveloperProfile to fetch developer profile data.
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useDevOpsChallengeStore.tsx Created a new Zustand store to manage state for developer profiles and course phase participation.
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/triggerAssessment.ts Added new asynchronous function triggerAssessment to post an assessment trigger request.
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useCreateRepository.ts
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useGetDeveloperProfile.ts
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useTriggerAssessment.ts
Added new custom hooks (useCreateRepository, useGetDeveloperProfile, useTriggerAssessment) to manage repository creation, profile fetching, and assessment trigger workflows.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant DP as DevOpsChallengePage
    participant GU as GithubUsernameInput
    participant AP as AssessmentPanel
    participant HS as Hooks/Store
    participant S as Server

    U->>DP: Visit DevOps Challenge page
    alt Developer Profile Missing
        DP->>GU: Render GitHub Username Input
        U->>GU: Enter username & click create
        GU->>HS: Trigger repository creation (useCreateRepository)
        HS->>S: POST createRepository request
        S-->>HS: Repository created response
        HS-->>GU: Update developer profile state
    else Developer Profile Exists
        DP->>AP: Render AssessmentPanel
        U->>AP: Click Assessment button
        AP->>HS: Trigger assessment (useTriggerAssessment)
        HS->>S: POST triggerAssessment request
        S-->>HS: Assessment result response
        HS-->>AP: Update assessment status
    end
Loading

Suggested reviewers

  • Mtze

Poem

I'm Bunny, hopping in delight,
Code paths clear, and changes bright.
New hooks and flows, a daring chase,
In DevOps fields, we set the pace.
With carrots 🥕 and code so keen,
I celebrate this change serene!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rappm rappm changed the title 244 devops challenge trigger challenge assessment DevOps Challenge: 244 devops challenge trigger challenge assessment Mar 18, 2025
@mathildeshagl mathildeshagl changed the title DevOps Challenge: 244 devops challenge trigger challenge assessment DevOps Challenge: Trigger challenge assessment Mar 18, 2025
@mathildeshagl mathildeshagl self-assigned this Mar 18, 2025
@mathildeshagl mathildeshagl marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2025 12:04
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (16)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/FeedbackItem.ts (1)

1-4: Clean interface design with appropriate type safety

The FeedbackItem interface is well-defined with proper type constraints. The string literal union type for type provides good type safety while allowing for the four specific message categories.

Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose of this interface and its properties, especially if this will be consumed by other developers.

+/**
+ * Represents a feedback item in the assessment result
+ */
 export interface FeedbackItem {
+    /**
+     * The type of feedback that determines how it's displayed
+     */
     type: "success" | "error" | "warning" | "info"
+    /**
+     * The feedback message content
+     */
     message: string
   }
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/RepositoryData.ts (1)

1-7: Well-structured repository data interface

The RepositoryData interface is well-designed and properly imports its dependency. The use of a union type with null for lastAssessment is appropriate for handling the case where no assessment exists yet.

Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the interface properties, particularly to explain what remainingAttempts represents in your application context.

 import { AssessmentResult } from './AssessmentResult'

+/**
+ * Represents data about a repository being assessed
+ */
 export interface RepositoryData {
+  /**
+   * URL of the repository being assessed
+   */
   repositoryUrl: string
+  /**
+   * Number of assessment attempts the user has left
+   */
   remainingAttempts: number
+  /**
+   * Results from the last assessment run, or null if no assessment has been run
+   */
   lastAssessment: AssessmentResult | null
 }
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/AssessmentResult.ts (1)

1-7: Well-defined assessment result structure

The AssessmentResult interface provides a clear contract for assessment data. The status property correctly uses a union type to constrain possible values.

Consider using a more specific type for timestamp to enforce a consistent date format, or add JSDoc comments to specify the expected format.

 import { FeedbackItem } from "./FeedbackItem"

+/**
+ * Represents the result of a repository assessment
+ */
 export interface AssessmentResult {
+  /**
+   * The status of the assessment
+   */
   status: "success" | "failed" | "pending" | null
+  /**
+   * The timestamp when the assessment was performed (ISO format)
+   */
   timestamp: string
+  /**
+   * List of feedback items from the assessment
+   */
   feedback: FeedbackItem[]
 }
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/components/AssessmentFeedback.tsx (6)

9-21: Consider refactoring helper functions for better performance

The getAlertIcon function is well-structured, but it creates new React elements on every render. Consider moving this function outside the component to prevent unnecessary recreation on each render.

Also, the type parameter should be more strictly typed as FeedbackItem['type'] rather than string for better type safety.

+import { FeedbackItem } from "../../interfaces/FeedbackItem"
+
+const getAlertIcon = (type: FeedbackItem['type']) => {
+  switch (type) {
+    case "success":
+      return <CheckCircle className="h-4 w-4 text-green-800 dark:text-green-300" />
+    case "error":
+      return <AlertCircle className="h-4 w-4 text-red-800 dark:text-red-300" />
+    case "warning":
+      return <AlertTriangle className="h-4 w-4 text-yellow-800 dark:text-yellow-300" />
+    default:
+      return <Info className="h-4 w-4 text-gray-800 dark:text-gray-300" />
+  }
+}
+
 interface AssessmentFeedbackProps {
   feedback: FeedbackItem[]
 }

 export function AssessmentFeedback({ feedback }: AssessmentFeedbackProps) {
-  const getAlertIcon = (type: string) => {
-    switch (type) {
-      case "success":
-        return <CheckCircle className="h-4 w-4 text-green-800 dark:text-green-300" /> // Green icon for success
-      case "error":
-        return <AlertCircle className="h-4 w-4 text-red-800 dark:text-red-300" /> // Red icon for error
-      case "warning":
-        return <AlertTriangle className="h-4 w-4 text-yellow-800 dark:text-yellow-300" /> // Yellow icon for warning
-      default:
-        return <Info className="h-4 w-4 text-gray-800 dark:text-gray-300" /> // Default icon for info
-    }
-  }

23-25: Improve type safety for helper function

Use FeedbackItem['type'] instead of string for better type safety. Also consider moving this function outside the component.

-  const getAlertVariant = (type: string): "default" | "destructive" => {
+  const getAlertVariant = (type: FeedbackItem['type']): "default" | "destructive" => {
     return type === "error" ? "destructive" : "default"
   }

27-38: Improve type safety for helper function

Similar to the other functions, use the specific union type and consider moving this outside the component.

-  const getAlertTitle = (type: string) => {
+  const getAlertTitle = (type: FeedbackItem['type']) => {
     switch (type) {
       case "success":
         return "Success"
       case "error":
         return "Error"
       case "warning":
         return "Warning"
       default:
         return "Info"
     }
   }

40-48: Consider using a more consistent pattern for text color logic

This function uses a different pattern (if statements) compared to the other helper functions (switch). Consider using a switch statement here as well for consistency, and improve the type safety as suggested for the other functions.

-  const getAlertTextColor = (type: string) => {
+  const getAlertTextColor = (type: FeedbackItem['type']) => {
-    if (type === "success") {
-      return "text-green-800 dark:text-green-300" // Green text for success
-    }
-    if (type === "error") {
-      return "text-red-800 dark:text-red-300" // Red text for error
-    }
-    return "text-gray-800 dark:text-gray-300" // Default text color for other types
+    switch (type) {
+      case "success":
+        return "text-green-800 dark:text-green-300" // Green text for success
+      case "error":
+        return "text-red-800 dark:text-red-300" // Red text for error
+      case "warning":
+        return "text-yellow-800 dark:text-yellow-300" // Yellow text for warning
+      default:
+        return "text-gray-800 dark:text-gray-300" // Default text color
+    }
   }

50-62: Use unique keys for feedback items instead of index

Using array indices as keys can lead to inefficient updates and potential bugs if the array items change order. If each feedback item has a unique identifier, use that instead. If not, consider creating a more stable key by combining multiple properties.

Also, consider adding a message for when the feedback array is empty.

   return (
     <div className="space-y-4 mt-2">
+      {feedback.length === 0 && (
+        <div className="text-gray-500">No feedback available.</div>
+      )}
       {feedback.map((item, index) => (
-        <Alert key={index} variant={getAlertVariant(item.type)}>
+        <Alert key={`${item.type}-${index}`} variant={getAlertVariant(item.type)}>
           <div className="flex items-center">
             {getAlertIcon(item.type)}
             <AlertTitle className={`ml-2 ${getAlertTextColor(item.type)}`}>{getAlertTitle(item.type)}</AlertTitle>
           </div>
           <AlertDescription className={`mt-1 ${getAlertTextColor(item.type)}`}>{item.message}</AlertDescription>
         </Alert>
       ))}
     </div>
   )

64-65: Choose one export style for consistency

You're using both named export and default export for the same component. This is redundant and can lead to confusion. Choose one style and stick with it based on your project's conventions.

 export function AssessmentFeedback({ feedback }: AssessmentFeedbackProps) {
   // Component implementation...
 }
 
-export default AssessmentFeedback
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/Overview/OverviewPage.tsx (3)

11-15: Consider using environment variables or backend API for initial data.

While using hardcoded dummy data is fine for development, in a production environment, you might want to fetch this data from an API or use environment variables for configurable values.


22-65: Improve the assessment simulation with configurable parameters and error handling.

The current implementation has a few potential improvements:

  1. Extract the timeout duration (2000ms) as a constant for better maintainability
  2. Add error handling for the API call simulation
  3. Extract the feedback messages to a separate constant or configuration
+// Constants
+const ASSESSMENT_TIMEOUT_MS = 2000;
+const SUCCESS_FEEDBACK = [{ type: "success", message: "All tests passed successfully!" }];
+const FAILURE_FEEDBACK = [
+  { type: "error", message: "Missing required file: README.md" },
+  { type: "error", message: "Test suite failed: 3/10 tests passing" },
+];

 // Simulate triggering an assessment
 const triggerAssessment = async () => {
   if (repositoryData.remainingAttempts <= 0) {
     toast({
       title: "No attempts remaining",
       description: "You have used all your assessment attempts.",
       variant: "destructive",
     })
     return
   }

   setIsAssessing(true)

   // Simulate API call to challenge server
-  setTimeout(() => {
-    // Randomly succeed or fail for demo purposes
-    const success = Math.random() > 0.5
+  try {
+    // Simulate API call with timeout
+    await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, ASSESSMENT_TIMEOUT_MS));
+    
+    // Randomly succeed or fail for demo purposes
+    const success = Math.random() > 0.5;

     setRepositoryData({
       ...repositoryData,
       remainingAttempts: repositoryData.remainingAttempts - 1,
       lastAssessment: {
         status: success ? "success" : "failed",
         timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
-        feedback: success
-          ? [{ type: "success", message: "All tests passed successfully!" }]
-          : [
-              { type: "error", message: "Missing required file: README.md" },
-              { type: "error", message: "Test suite failed: 3/10 tests passing" },
-            ],
+        feedback: success ? SUCCESS_FEEDBACK : FAILURE_FEEDBACK,
       },
     })

     toast({
       title: success ? "Assessment Successful" : "Assessment Failed",
       description: success
         ? "Your repository passed all checks!"
         : "Your repository failed some checks. See feedback for details.",
       variant: success ? "default" : "destructive",
     })

     setIsAssessing(false)
-  }, 2000)
+  } catch (error) {
+    console.error("Assessment failed:", error);
+    toast({
+      title: "Assessment Error",
+      description: "An error occurred while assessing your repository.",
+      variant: "destructive",
+    });
+    setIsAssessing(false);
+  }
 }

85-96: Consider adding accessibility improvements to the button.

The button could benefit from some accessibility improvements, such as adding an aria-label to describe the action more clearly.

 <Button
   onClick={triggerAssessment}
   disabled={isAssessing || repositoryData.remainingAttempts <= 0}
   className="flex items-center"
+  aria-label={isAssessing ? "Assessment in progress" : "Trigger repository assessment"}
 >
   {isAssessing ? (
     <RefreshCw className="mr-2 h-4 w-4 animate-spin" />
   ) : (
     <GitPullRequest className="mr-2 h-4 w-4" />
   )}
   <span>{isAssessing ? "Assessing..." : "Trigger Assessment"}</span>
 </Button>
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/components/RepositoryInfo.tsx (4)

26-26: Remove unnecessary comment.

The comment "Assuming you have a toast hook" is unnecessary since the toast hook is properly imported at the top of the file.

-  const { toast } = useToast() // Assuming you have a toast hook
+  const { toast } = useToast()

81-81: Remove unnecessary HTML comment.

The HTML comment in JSX is unnecessary and can be removed.

-              {/* Clipboard or Check icon */}

106-109: Use optional chaining for better safety.

As suggested by the static analysis tool, you should use optional chaining to make the code more concise and safer.

-                {repositoryData.lastAssessment && repositoryData.lastAssessment.status
-                  ? repositoryData.lastAssessment.status.charAt(0).toUpperCase() +
-                    repositoryData.lastAssessment.status.slice(1)
-                  : "Not Assessed"}
+                {repositoryData.lastAssessment?.status
+                  ? repositoryData.lastAssessment.status.charAt(0).toUpperCase() +
+                    repositoryData.lastAssessment.status.slice(1)
+                  : "Not Assessed"}
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 106-106: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)


125-126: Choose a single export pattern for consistency.

The component is exported twice - once as a named export and once as a default export. Choose one approach for consistency throughout the codebase.

If you prefer default exports:

 export function RepositoryInfo({ repositoryData }: RepositoryInfoProps) {
   // Component implementation
 }
 
-export default RepositoryInfo

If you prefer named exports:

-export function RepositoryInfo({ repositoryData }: RepositoryInfoProps) {
+function RepositoryInfo({ repositoryData }: RepositoryInfoProps) {
   // Component implementation  
 }
 
 export default RepositoryInfo
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab8ee5f and adb7a61.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/routes/index.tsx (0 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/sidebar/index.tsx (0 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/AssessmentResult.ts (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/FeedbackItem.ts (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/RepositoryData.ts (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/GitHub/GitHubPage.tsx (0 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/Overview/OverviewPage.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/components/AssessmentFeedback.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/components/RepositoryInfo.tsx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/sidebar/index.tsx
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/GitHub/GitHubPage.tsx
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/routes/index.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (4)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/AssessmentResult.ts (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/FeedbackItem.ts (1) (1)
  • FeedbackItem (1:4)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/Overview/OverviewPage.tsx (3)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/RepositoryData.ts (1) (1)
  • RepositoryData (3:7)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/components/RepositoryInfo.tsx (1) (1)
  • RepositoryInfo (25:124)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/components/AssessmentFeedback.tsx (1) (1)
  • AssessmentFeedback (9:63)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/components/AssessmentFeedback.tsx (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/FeedbackItem.ts (1) (1)
  • FeedbackItem (1:4)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/components/RepositoryInfo.tsx (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/RepositoryData.ts (1) (1)
  • RepositoryData (3:7)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/components/RepositoryInfo.tsx

[error] 106-106: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/components/AssessmentFeedback.tsx (1)

5-7: Clean props interface definition

The props interface is simple and clear, correctly using the imported FeedbackItem type.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to In Progress in PROMPT Mar 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/ChallengePage.tsx (2)

11-15: Consider moving dummy data to a separate file.

For better separation of concerns, consider moving the dummy data to a separate file (e.g., mockData.ts). This would make the component more focused and easier to maintain as the application grows.

-const dummyRepositoryData: RepositoryData = {
-  repositoryUrl: "https://example.com",
-  remainingAttempts: 3,
-  lastAssessment: null,
-}

And in a new file mockData.ts:

import { RepositoryData } from "./interfaces/RepositoryData";

export const dummyRepositoryData: RepositoryData = {
  repositoryUrl: "https://example.com",
  remainingAttempts: 3,
  lastAssessment: null,
};

23-65: Add error handling to the assessment simulation.

The assessment simulation could benefit from additional error handling. While the timeout simulates an API call, there's no handling for potential failures in a real API integration scenario.

Consider adding a try/catch block:

  const triggerAssessment = async () => {
    if (repositoryData.remainingAttempts <= 0) {
      toast({
        title: "No attempts remaining",
        description: "You have used all your assessment attempts.",
        variant: "destructive",
      })
      return
    }

    setIsAssessing(true)

+   try {
      // Simulate API call to challenge server
      setTimeout(() => {
        // Randomly succeed or fail for demo purposes
        const success = Math.random() > 0.5

        setRepositoryData({
          ...repositoryData,
          remainingAttempts: repositoryData.remainingAttempts - 1,
          lastAssessment: {
            status: success ? "success" : "failed",
            timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
            feedback: success
              ? [{ type: "success", message: "All tests passed successfully!" }]
              : [
                  { type: "error", message: "Missing required file: README.md" },
                  { type: "error", message: "Test suite failed: 3/10 tests passing" },
                ],
          },
        })

        toast({
          title: success ? "Assessment Successful" : "Assessment Failed",
          description: success
            ? "Your repository passed all checks!"
            : "Your repository failed some checks. See feedback for details.",
          variant: success ? "default" : "destructive",
        })

        setIsAssessing(false)
      }, 2000)
+   } catch (error) {
+     console.error("Assessment failed:", error);
+     toast({
+       title: "Assessment Error",
+       description: "There was an error processing your assessment. Please try again.",
+       variant: "destructive",
+     });
+     setIsAssessing(false);
+   }
  }
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentFeedback.tsx (2)

9-48: Consider using a mapper object for helper functions.

The component has several helper functions with similar switch/case patterns. Consider refactoring these into a mapping object to reduce repetition and improve maintainability.

-  const getAlertIcon = (type: string) => {
-    switch (type) {
-      case "success":
-        return <CheckCircle className="h-4 w-4 text-green-800 dark:text-green-300" /> // Green icon for success
-      case "error":
-        return <AlertCircle className="h-4 w-4 text-red-800 dark:text-red-300" /> // Red icon for error
-      case "warning":
-        return <AlertTriangle className="h-4 w-4 text-yellow-800 dark:text-yellow-300" /> // Yellow icon for warning
-      default:
-        return <Info className="h-4 w-4 text-gray-800 dark:text-gray-300" /> // Default icon for info
-    }
-  }
-
-  const getAlertVariant = (type: string): "default" | "destructive" => {
-    return type === "error" ? "destructive" : "default"
-  }
-
-  const getAlertTitle = (type: string) => {
-    switch (type) {
-      case "success":
-        return "Success"
-      case "error":
-        return "Error"
-      case "warning":
-        return "Warning"
-      default:
-        return "Info"
-    }
-  }
-
-  const getAlertTextColor = (type: string) => {
-    if (type === "success") {
-      return "text-green-800 dark:text-green-300" // Green text for success
-    }
-    if (type === "error") {
-      return "text-red-800 dark:text-red-300" // Red text for error
-    }
-    return "text-gray-800 dark:text-gray-300" // Default text color for other types
-  }

+  const alertConfig = {
+    success: {
+      icon: <CheckCircle className="h-4 w-4 text-green-800 dark:text-green-300" />,
+      title: "Success",
+      textColor: "text-green-800 dark:text-green-300",
+      variant: "default" as const
+    },
+    error: {
+      icon: <AlertCircle className="h-4 w-4 text-red-800 dark:text-red-300" />,
+      title: "Error",
+      textColor: "text-red-800 dark:text-red-300",
+      variant: "destructive" as const
+    },
+    warning: {
+      icon: <AlertTriangle className="h-4 w-4 text-yellow-800 dark:text-yellow-300" />,
+      title: "Warning",
+      textColor: "text-gray-800 dark:text-gray-300",
+      variant: "default" as const
+    },
+    info: {
+      icon: <Info className="h-4 w-4 text-gray-800 dark:text-gray-300" />,
+      title: "Info",
+      textColor: "text-gray-800 dark:text-gray-300",
+      variant: "default" as const
+    }
+  };
+
+  const getAlertConfig = (type: string) => {
+    return alertConfig[type as keyof typeof alertConfig] || alertConfig.info;
+  };

65-65: Redundant default export.

The component is already named and exported on line 9. The additional default export on line 65 is redundant. Consider removing one of these exports to avoid confusion.

-export default AssessmentFeedback
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/RepositoryInfo.tsx (3)

29-44: Add error handling for clipboard operations.

The clipboard operation assumes success but could fail in certain browsers or environments. Consider adding error handling to provide better user feedback.

  const handleCopyToClipboard = (text: string) => {
-   navigator.clipboard.writeText(text)
-   setCopied(true)
-
-   // Show feedback to the user (can be a toast or tooltip)
-   toast({
-     title: "URL Copied",
-     description: "The repository URL has been copied to your clipboard.",
-     variant: "default",
-   })
+   navigator.clipboard.writeText(text)
+     .then(() => {
+       setCopied(true)
+       
+       // Show feedback to the user (can be a toast or tooltip)
+       toast({
+         title: "URL Copied",
+         description: "The repository URL has been copied to your clipboard.",
+         variant: "default",
+       })
+       
+       // Reset copied state after a short delay
+       setTimeout(() => {
+         setCopied(false)
+       }, 2000) // Icon will revert after 2 seconds
+     })
+     .catch((error) => {
+       console.error("Failed to copy to clipboard:", error);
+       toast({
+         title: "Copy Failed",
+         description: "Could not copy the URL to your clipboard. Please try again.",
+         variant: "destructive",
+       })
+     });
-   // Reset copied state after a short delay
-   setTimeout(() => {
-     setCopied(false)
-   }, 2000) // Icon will revert after 2 seconds
  }

106-109: Use optional chaining as suggested by static analysis.

The static analysis tool correctly identified that optional chaining would improve this code by simplifying the conditional and making it more resilient.

-{repositoryData.lastAssessment && repositoryData.lastAssessment.status
-  ? repositoryData.lastAssessment.status.charAt(0).toUpperCase() +
-    repositoryData.lastAssessment.status.slice(1)
-  : "Not Assessed"}
+{repositoryData.lastAssessment?.status
+  ? repositoryData.lastAssessment.status.charAt(0).toUpperCase() +
+    repositoryData.lastAssessment.status.slice(1)
+  : "Not Assessed"}
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 106-106: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)


126-126: Redundant default export.

Similar to the AssessmentFeedback component, this component already has a named export at line 25. The additional default export is redundant.

-export default RepositoryInfo
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between adb7a61 and a70a82f.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/routes/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentFeedback.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/RepositoryInfo.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/ChallengePage.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/routes/index.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/ChallengePage.tsx (2)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/RepositoryInfo.tsx (1) (1)
  • RepositoryInfo (25:124)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentFeedback.tsx (1) (1)
  • AssessmentFeedback (9:63)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/RepositoryInfo.tsx

[error] 106-106: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: build-servers / intro-course / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-server-intro-course
  • GitHub Check: build-servers / core / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-server-core
  • GitHub Check: build-servers / intro-course / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-server-intro-course
  • GitHub Check: build-servers / core / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-server-core
  • GitHub Check: build-clients / clients-base / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-clients-base
  • GitHub Check: build-clients / clients-base / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-clients-base
🔇 Additional comments (4)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/ChallengePage.tsx (2)

1-10: Clean imports organization.

The imports are well-organized, separating UI components, icons, hooks, custom components, and interfaces.


67-121: Well-structured UI with clear component organization.

The UI layout is well-structured with clear section organization and appropriate spacing. The conditional rendering for assessment results is implemented correctly.

clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentFeedback.tsx (2)

1-8: Well-defined component interface.

The imports and component props interface are clearly defined. The use of a dedicated interface for the feedback props enhances type safety.


50-63: Well-implemented UI rendering with consistent styling.

The component correctly maps over feedback items and applies appropriate styling based on the feedback type. The use of key indices is acceptable in this case since the items are read-only and not reordered.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Nitpick comments (15)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/queries/getStudentInfo.ts (2)

11-13: Improve error message to match function purpose.

The error message "Failed to trigger assessment" doesn't accurately describe the function's purpose, which is to get student information.

-        throw new Error('Failed to trigger assessment');
+        throw new Error('Failed to fetch student information');

1-17: Consider adding request timeout and more detailed error handling.

The current implementation lacks timeout handling and doesn't include response details in error messages, which could be helpful for debugging.

export const getStudentInfo = async (
    coursePhaseID: string
) => {
    const response = await fetch(`http://devops-challenge.aet.cit.tum.de/${coursePhaseID}/studentTest`, {
        method: 'GET',
        headers: {
            'Content-Type': 'application/json',
        },
+       signal: AbortSignal.timeout(10000), // 10-second timeout
    });

    if (!response.ok) {
-        throw new Error('Failed to trigger assessment');
+        const errorText = await response.text().catch(() => 'No response body');
+        throw new Error(`Failed to fetch student information: ${response.status} ${response.statusText} - ${errorText}`);
    }

    const data = await response.json();
    return data;
};
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/queries/triggerAssessment.ts (1)

1-19: Consider adding request timeout and more detailed error handling.

The current implementation lacks timeout handling and doesn't include response details in error messages, which could be helpful for debugging.

export const triggerAssessment = async (
    coursePhaseID: string,
    githubUsername: string
) => {
    const response = await fetch(`http://devops-challenge.aet.cit.tum.de/${coursePhaseID}/studentTest`, {
        method: 'POST',
        headers: {
            'Content-Type': 'application/json',
        },
        body: JSON.stringify({ githubUsername }),
+       signal: AbortSignal.timeout(15000), // 15-second timeout for potentially longer operation
    });

    if (!response.ok) {
-        throw new Error('Failed to trigger assessment');
+        const errorText = await response.text().catch(() => 'No response body');
+        throw new Error(`Failed to trigger assessment: ${response.status} ${response.statusText} - ${errorText}`);
    }

    const data = await response.json();
    return data.message;
};
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx (3)

1-3: Consider using .ts file extension for non-JSX files.

This file doesn't contain any JSX but has a .tsx extension. Using a .ts extension would be more appropriate.


20-30: Initialize optional properties with undefined for consistency.

The store initializes some optional properties with empty strings and numbers rather than undefined. This might cause confusion since the type definition marks these properties as optional.

export const useChallengeStore = create<ChallengeStoreState & ChallengeStoreActions>((set) => ({
-  repoUrl: '',
-  attempts: 0,
-  maxAttempts: 0,
-  feedback: '',
+  // Optional properties initialized as undefined to match type definition
+  repoUrl: undefined,
+  attempts: undefined,
+  maxAttempts: undefined,
+  feedback: undefined,
  setCoursePhaseParticipation: (coursePhaseParticipation) => set({ coursePhaseParticipation }),
  setRepoUrl: (repoUrl) => set({ repoUrl }),
  setAttempts: (attempts) => set({ attempts }),
  setMaxAttempts: (maxAttempts) => set({ maxAttempts }),
  setFeedback: (feedback) => set({ feedback }),
}))

4-30: Consider adding a reset action for the store.

The store defines actions to set individual properties but lacks a way to reset the entire state. Adding a reset action would be helpful for clearing state when needed.

interface ChallengeStoreActions {
  setCoursePhaseParticipation: (coursePhaseParticipation: CoursePhaseParticipationWithStudent) => void
  setRepoUrl: (repoUrl?: string) => void
  setAttempts: (attempts?: number) => void
  setMaxAttempts: (maxAttempts?: number) => void
  setFeedback: (feedback?: string) => void
+  resetState: () => void
}

export const useChallengeStore = create<ChallengeStoreState & ChallengeStoreActions>((set) => ({
  repoUrl: '',
  attempts: 0,
  maxAttempts: 0,
  feedback: '',
  setCoursePhaseParticipation: (coursePhaseParticipation) => set({ coursePhaseParticipation }),
  setRepoUrl: (repoUrl) => set({ repoUrl }),
  setAttempts: (attempts) => set({ attempts }),
  setMaxAttempts: (maxAttempts) => set({ maxAttempts }),
  setFeedback: (feedback) => set({ feedback }),
+  resetState: () => set({
+    coursePhaseParticipation: undefined,
+    repoUrl: undefined,
+    attempts: undefined,
+    maxAttempts: undefined,
+    feedback: undefined,
+  }),
}))
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/createRepository.ts (2)

1-19: Consider adding request timeout and more detailed error handling.

The current implementation lacks timeout handling and doesn't include response details in error messages, which could be helpful for debugging.

export const createRepository = async (
    githubUsername: string,
    coursePhaseID: string
) => {
    const response = await fetch(`http://devops-challenge.aet.cit.tum.de/${coursePhaseID}/repository`, {
        method: 'POST',
        headers: {
            'Content-Type': 'application/json',
        },
        body: JSON.stringify({ githubUsername }),
+       signal: AbortSignal.timeout(20000), // 20-second timeout for repository creation
    });

    if (!response.ok) {
-        throw new Error('Failed to create repository');
+        const errorText = await response.text().catch(() => 'No response body');
+        throw new Error(`Failed to create repository: ${response.status} ${response.statusText} - ${errorText}`);
    }

    const data = await response.json();
    return data.repositoryUrl;
};

1-19: Consider implementing input validation before making the API request.

The function accepts githubUsername without validation. Adding validation would prevent unnecessary API calls with invalid inputs.

export const createRepository = async (
    githubUsername: string,
    coursePhaseID: string
) => {
+    // Basic validation for GitHub username format
+    if (!githubUsername || !githubUsername.match(/^[a-z\d](?:[a-z\d]|-(?=[a-z\d])){0,38}$/i)) {
+        throw new Error('Invalid GitHub username format');
+    }
+
+    if (!coursePhaseID) {
+        throw new Error('Course phase ID is required');
+    }
+
    const response = await fetch(`http://devops-challenge.aet.cit.tum.de/${coursePhaseID}/repository`, {
        method: 'POST',
        headers: {
            'Content-Type': 'application/json',
        },
        body: JSON.stringify({ githubUsername }),
    });

    if (!response.ok) {
        throw new Error('Failed to create repository');
    }

    const data = await response.json();
    return data.repositoryUrl;
};
clients/devops_challenge_component/routes/index.tsx (1)

19-22: Consider using lowercase for URL paths.

The path /Test uses uppercase, which is unconventional for URLs. Most web standards recommend lowercase URLs for consistency and better usability.

-    path: '/Test',
+    path: '/test',
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/ChallengePage.tsx (1)

5-5: Remove unused import.

The Github icon is imported but not used in the component.

-import { AlertCircle, CheckCircle, Github, GitPullRequest, RefreshCw } from "lucide-react"
+import { AlertCircle, CheckCircle, GitPullRequest, RefreshCw } from "lucide-react"
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/StudentRepoForm.tsx (5)

1-10: Remove unused import.

The getStudentInfo import on line 4 is not used anywhere in the component.

-import { getStudentInfo } from '../network/queries/getStudentInfo'

13-16: Provide a more user-friendly error handling for missing phaseId.

Currently, an error is thrown when phaseId is missing, which would crash the application. Consider redirecting to an error page or showing a more user-friendly error message.

-    if (!phaseId) {
-        throw new Error("Phase ID is required");
-    }
+    if (!phaseId) {
+        return (
+            <div className="max-w-lg mx-auto space-y-4">
+                <Card>
+                    <CardHeader>
+                        <CardTitle>Error</CardTitle>
+                    </CardHeader>
+                    <CardContent>
+                        <p className="text-red-500">Phase ID is required. Please navigate to this page from the correct course phase.</p>
+                    </CardContent>
+                </Card>
+            </div>
+        );
+    }

66-74: Improve GitHub username validation.

Currently, the validation only checks if the GitHub username is empty. Consider adding more validation rules based on GitHub's username requirements (alphanumeric characters, hyphens, maximum of 39 characters).

const handleCreateRepo = async () => {
-   if (!githubUsername) {
+   // GitHub username validation rules
+   const isValidGithubUsername = /^[a-z\d](?:[a-z\d]|-(?=[a-z\d])){0,38}$/i.test(githubUsername);
+   
+   if (!githubUsername) {
        toast({ title: 'Error', description: 'Please enter your GitHub username', variant: 'destructive' })
        return
    }
+   if (!isValidGithubUsername) {
+       toast({ title: 'Error', description: 'Please enter a valid GitHub username', variant: 'destructive' })
+       return
+   }
    setLoading(true)
    // Rest of the function...
}

76-85: Add error state display and retry options.

When displaying the repository and assessment controls, consider adding error states and retry options for a better user experience.

    ) : (
        <>
            <p>Repository: <a href={repoUrl} className="text-blue-500 underline" target="_blank">{repoUrl}</a></p>
+           {feedback && feedback.includes("error") && (
+               <div className="bg-red-50 border border-red-200 rounded p-3 my-2">
+                   <p className="text-red-700">{feedback}</p>
+               </div>
+           )}
            <Button onClick={handleTriggerAssessment} disabled={loading || (attempts !== undefined && attempts >= (maxAttempts ?? 0))}>
                Start Assessment
            </Button>
+           {attempts !== undefined && maxAttempts !== undefined && attempts >= maxAttempts && (
+               <p className="text-amber-600">You've used all your attempts. Please contact your instructor if you need more attempts.</p>
+           )}
            {attempts !== undefined && maxAttempts !== undefined && (
                <p>Remaining attempts: {maxAttempts - attempts}</p>
            )}
            {feedback && <p className="text-gray-700">{feedback}</p>}
        </>
    )

77-77: Add rel="noopener noreferrer" to external links.

For security reasons, add rel="noopener noreferrer" to external links that use target="_blank".

-<p>Repository: <a href={repoUrl} className="text-blue-500 underline" target="_blank">{repoUrl}</a></p>
+<p>Repository: <a href={repoUrl} className="text-blue-500 underline" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">{repoUrl}</a></p>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a70a82f and 120f96c.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/routes/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/sidebar/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/StudentRepoForm.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/FeedbackItem.ts (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/createRepository.ts (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/queries/getStudentInfo.ts (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/queries/triggerAssessment.ts (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/ChallengePage.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/sidebar/index.tsx
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/FeedbackItem.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (2)
clients/devops_challenge_component/routes/index.tsx (2)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/ChallengePage.tsx (1) (1)
  • ChallengePage (17:122)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/StudentRepoForm.tsx (1) (1)
  • StudentRepoForm (12:91)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/StudentRepoForm.tsx (3)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx (1) (1)
  • useChallengeStore (20:30)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/createRepository.ts (1) (1)
  • createRepository (1:19)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/queries/triggerAssessment.ts (1) (1)
  • triggerAssessment (1:19)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: build-servers / intro-course / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-server-intro-course
  • GitHub Check: build-servers / core / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-server-core
  • GitHub Check: build-servers / intro-course / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-server-intro-course
  • GitHub Check: build-servers / core / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-server-core
  • GitHub Check: build-clients / clients-base / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-clients-base
  • GitHub Check: build-clients / clients-base / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-clients-base
🔇 Additional comments (5)
clients/devops_challenge_component/routes/index.tsx (2)

3-3: LGTM: Added proper component imports.

The imports for ChallengePage and StudentRepoForm are correctly added to support the updated routes.

Also applies to: 5-5


9-11: LGTM: Route updated to use ChallengePage.

The Overview route now correctly renders the ChallengePage component while maintaining the same path and permission requirements.

clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/ChallengePage.tsx (3)

1-10: LGTM: Clean imports with proper organization.

The imports are well-organized, separating React hooks, UI components, icons, and custom components.


11-15: LGTM: Clean dummy data initialization.

The dummy repository data is properly structured with default values.


67-120: LGTM: Well-structured UI with clear component organization.

The UI layout is clean and well-organized with appropriate semantic structure. The conditional rendering of assessment results and proper handling of loading states provides good user feedback.

@mathildeshagl mathildeshagl marked this pull request as draft March 18, 2025 17:57
@mathildeshagl mathildeshagl marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2025 15:10
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx (3)

1-11: State interface looks good, but consider adding documentation.

The ChallengeStoreState interface is well-structured with appropriate optional types, but adding JSDoc comments would improve maintainability and help other developers understand the purpose of each property.

 interface ChallengeStoreState {
+  /** The course phase participation data including student information */
   coursePhaseParticipation?: CoursePhaseParticipationWithStudent
+  /** The URL of the student's GitHub repository for the challenge */
   repoUrl?: string
+  /** The number of assessment attempts the student has made */
   attempts?: number;
+  /** The maximum number of assessment attempts allowed */
   maxAttempts?: number;
+  /** Feedback message from the most recent assessment */
   feedback?: string
+  /** Whether the student has passed the challenge */
   hasPassed?: boolean;
 }

13-20: Actions interface is clear but has formatting issues.

The actions interface provides necessary state update methods, but there are formatting inconsistencies flagged by the linter.

 interface ChallengeStoreActions {
-  setCoursePhaseParticipation: (coursePhaseParticipation: CoursePhaseParticipationWithStudent) => void
+  setCoursePhaseParticipation: (
+    coursePhaseParticipation: CoursePhaseParticipationWithStudent
+  ) => void
   setRepoUrl: (repoUrl?: string) => void
   setAttempts: (attempts?: number) => void
   setMaxAttempts: (maxAttempts?: number) => void
   setFeedback: (feedback?: string) => void
-  setHasPassed: (status: boolean) => void;
+  setHasPassed: (status: boolean) => void
 }
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Client Linting Report

[failure] 14-14: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx#L14
[prettier/prettier] Replace coursePhaseParticipation:·CoursePhaseParticipationWithStudent with ⏎····coursePhaseParticipation:·CoursePhaseParticipationWithStudent,⏎··


[failure] 19-19: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx#L19
[prettier/prettier] Delete ;


22-35: Store implementation is correct but has minor formatting issues.

The Zustand store implementation is functionally correct but contains some linting errors that should be fixed.

 export const useChallengeStore = create<ChallengeStoreState & ChallengeStoreActions>((set) => ({
   repoUrl: undefined,
   attempts: undefined,
   maxAttempts: undefined,
   feedback: undefined,
   hasPassed: undefined,

   setCoursePhaseParticipation: (coursePhaseParticipation) => set({ coursePhaseParticipation }),
   setRepoUrl: (repoUrl) => set({ repoUrl }),
   setAttempts: (attempts) => set({ attempts }),
   setMaxAttempts: (maxAttempts) => set({ maxAttempts }),
   setFeedback: (feedback) => set({ feedback }),
-  setHasPassed: (status) => set({ hasPassed: status }), 
+  setHasPassed: (status) => set({ hasPassed: status }),
 }))
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Client Linting Report

[failure] 34-34: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx#L34
[prettier/prettier] Delete ·


[failure] 35-35: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx#L35
[prettier/prettier] Insert

clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/RepositoryInfo.tsx (1)

1-26: Consider adding conditional rendering for long URLs.

For very long repository URLs, the current implementation might cause layout issues despite the break-all class. Consider adding truncation with ellipsis for better UI.

 import { CheckCircle } from "lucide-react"
+import { useState } from "react"
 
 interface RepositoryInfoProps {
   repoUrl: string
 }
 
 export function RepositoryInfo({ repoUrl }: RepositoryInfoProps) {
+  const [showFullUrl, setShowFullUrl] = useState(false)
+  
+  // Function to truncate URL if it's too long
+  const displayUrl = () => {
+    if (showFullUrl || repoUrl.length < 50) return repoUrl
+    return `${repoUrl.substring(0, 47)}...`
+  }
+
   return (
     <div className="flex flex-col space-y-2 bg-muted/30 p-4 rounded-lg">
       <div className="text-sm font-medium text-muted-foreground">Repository URL</div>
       <div className="flex items-center">
         <CheckCircle className="h-4 w-4 text-green-500 mr-2 flex-shrink-0" />
         <a
           href={repoUrl}
           className="text-primary underline hover:text-primary/80 transition-colors break-all"
           target="_blank"
           rel="noopener noreferrer"
+          onClick={(e) => {
+            if (repoUrl.length >= 50) {
+              e.preventDefault()
+              setShowFullUrl(!showFullUrl)
+            }
+          }}
         >
-          {repoUrl}
+          {displayUrl()}
         </a>
       </div>
     </div>
   )
 }
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/ChallengePage.tsx (1)

24-51: Consider adding retry logic for API failures.

If the API call fails for transient reasons, the user has no way to retry the data fetch without refreshing the page.

Consider adding a retry button when the fetch fails:

 useEffect(() => {
   // Fetch student info when the component mounts
   const fetchStudentInfo = async () => {
     try {
       const studentInfo = await getStudentInfo(phaseId)
       setRepoUrl(studentInfo.repositoryUrl)
       setAttempts(studentInfo.attempts)
       setMaxAttempts(studentInfo.maxAttempts)
       setHasPassed(studentInfo.hasPassed)
       if (studentInfo.message) {
         setFeedback(studentInfo.message)
       }
     } catch (error) {
       // Only show error if it's not a "not found" error
       if (!(error instanceof Error && error.message.includes("not found"))) {
         toast({
           title: "Error loading data",
           description: error instanceof Error ? error.message : "Unknown error",
           variant: "destructive",
         })
+        // Set error state to trigger retry UI
+        setLoadError(true)
       }
     } finally {
       setLoading(false)
     }
   }

   fetchStudentInfo()
 }, [phaseId, setRepoUrl, setAttempts, setMaxAttempts, setHasPassed, setFeedback, toast])

+// Add a retry button to the UI when an error occurs
+const retryFetch = () => {
+  setLoading(true)
+  setLoadError(false)
+  // Re-run the effect by forcing a re-render
+  setRetryCounter(prev => prev + 1)
+}

Add these states near the top of your component:

const [loadError, setLoadError] = useState(false)
const [retryCounter, setRetryCounter] = useState(0)

Then modify your conditional rendering to include the retry option:

 {loading ? (
   <div className="flex justify-center items-center py-8">
     <Loader2 className="h-8 w-8 animate-spin text-primary" />
   </div>
+) : loadError ? (
+  <div className="flex flex-col items-center py-8 space-y-4">
+    <div className="text-red-500">Failed to load data</div>
+    <Button onClick={retryFetch}>
+      Retry
+    </Button>
+  </div>
 ) : !repoUrl ? (
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx (5)

1-8: Unused import in GitHubHandleInput.

The component imports the Github icon from lucide-react but never uses it.

-import { Github, Loader2, AlertCircle } from "lucide-react"
+import { Loader2, AlertCircle } from "lucide-react"

61-69: Missing GitHub icon in the input field.

The input has className="pl-9" which adds padding on the left, suggesting a GitHub icon should be placed there, but no icon is rendered.

Add the GitHub icon to the input field:

 <div className="relative flex-1">
+  <Github className="absolute left-3 top-1/2 transform -translate-y-1/2 h-4 w-4 text-muted-foreground" />
   <Input
     placeholder="GitHub username"
     value={githubHandle}
     onChange={(e) => setGithubHandle(e.target.value)}
     className="pl-9"
     disabled={loading}
   />
 </div>

Don't forget to restore the imported Github icon.


22-29: Consider adding validation for GitHub username format.

The current validation only checks if the GitHub handle is empty but doesn't validate if it follows GitHub's username format rules.

Add a regex validation for GitHub usernames:

 const handleCreateRepo = async () => {
   if (!githubHandle) {
     toast({
       title: "GitHub username required",
       description: "Please enter your GitHub username to continue",
       variant: "destructive",
     })
     return
   }
+  
+  // GitHub username validation: alphanumeric characters and hyphens, no consecutive hyphens, no leading/trailing hyphens
+  const githubUsernameRegex = /^[a-z\d](?:[a-z\d]|-(?=[a-z\d])){0,38}$/i;
+  if (!githubUsernameRegex.test(githubHandle)) {
+    toast({
+      title: "Invalid GitHub username",
+      description: "Please enter a valid GitHub username (letters, numbers, and single hyphens)",
+      variant: "destructive",
+    })
+    return
+  }
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Client Linting Report

[failure] 25-25: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx#L25
[prettier/prettier] Replace "Please·enter·your·GitHub·username·to·continue" with 'Please·enter·your·GitHub·username·to·continue'


[failure] 26-26: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx#L26
[prettier/prettier] Replace "destructive" with 'destructive'


23-27: Linting errors for inconsistent quote types.

The codebase has linting errors related to quote usage in string literals.

   if (!githubHandle) {
     toast({
-      title: "GitHub username required",
-      description: "Please enter your GitHub username to continue",
-      variant: "destructive",
+      title: 'GitHub username required',
+      description: 'Please enter your GitHub username to continue',
+      variant: 'destructive',
     })
     return
   }
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Client Linting Report

[failure] 25-25: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx#L25
[prettier/prettier] Replace "Please·enter·your·GitHub·username·to·continue" with 'Please·enter·your·GitHub·username·to·continue'


[failure] 26-26: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx#L26
[prettier/prettier] Replace "destructive" with 'destructive'


35-39: More linting errors for inconsistent quote types.

The success toast also has linting errors for quote usage.

     toast({
-      title: "Repository created",
-      description: "Your challenge repository has been successfully created!",
-      variant: "default",
+      title: 'Repository created',
+      description: 'Your challenge repository has been successfully created!',
+      variant: 'default',
     })
   } catch (error) {
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Client Linting Report

[failure] 36-36: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx#L36
[prettier/prettier] Replace "Repository·created" with 'Repository·created'

clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx (4)

1-15: Consider fixing linting issues with quotes

The static analysis tool has identified multiple instances where double quotes are used instead of single quotes. Consider updating these to match your project's style guidelines.

-import { useState } from "react"
-import { useChallengeStore } from "../zustand/useChallengeStore"
-import { triggerAssessment } from "../network/queries/triggerAssessment"
+import { useState } from 'react'
+import { useChallengeStore } from '../zustand/useChallengeStore'
+import { triggerAssessment } from '../network/queries/triggerAssessment'

This pattern continues throughout the imports. Fixing these would ensure consistency with your project's linting rules.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Client Linting Report

[failure] 1-1: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L1
[prettier/prettier] Replace "react" with 'react'


[failure] 2-2: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L2
[prettier/prettier] Replace "../zustand/useChallengeStore" with '../zustand/useChallengeStore'


[failure] 3-3: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L3
[prettier/prettier] Replace "../network/queries/triggerAssessment" with '../network/queries/triggerAssessment'


[failure] 4-4: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L4
[prettier/prettier] Replace "../network/queries/getStudentInfo" with '../network/queries/getStudentInfo'


[failure] 5-5: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L5
[prettier/prettier] Replace "@/hooks/use-toast" with '@/hooks/use-toast'


[failure] 6-6: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L6
[prettier/prettier] Replace "@/components/ui/button" with '@/components/ui/button'


[failure] 7-7: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L7
[prettier/prettier] Replace "@/components/ui/progress" with '@/components/ui/progress'


[failure] 8-8: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L8
[prettier/prettier] Replace "@/components/ui/alert" with '@/components/ui/alert'


[failure] 9-9: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L9
[prettier/prettier] Replace "@/components/ui/badge" with '@/components/ui/badge'


[failure] 10-10: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L10
[prettier/prettier] Replace "lucide-react" with 'lucide-react'


24-55: Well-implemented assessment trigger function with proper error handling

The handleTriggerAssessment function follows best practices:

  • Uses async/await for promise handling
  • Includes proper loading state management
  • Has comprehensive error handling with informative toast messages
  • Updates multiple state values based on API responses

One suggestion is to add more specific error handling for network failures which are common in web applications.

 } catch (error) {
+  console.error('Assessment trigger failed:', error);
   toast({
     title: "Assessment failed",
     description: error instanceof Error ? error.message : "Unknown error",
     variant: "destructive",
   })
 }
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Client Linting Report

[failure] 42-42: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L42
[prettier/prettier] Replace "Assessment·completed" with 'Assessment·completed'


[failure] 43-43: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L43
[prettier/prettier] Replace "Your·code·has·been·evaluated.·Check·the·results·below." with 'Your·code·has·been·evaluated.·Check·the·results·below.'


64-114: Well-structured conditional UI rendering with appropriate feedback

The component effectively handles different states:

  • Success state with green alert
  • Progress tracking with badge and progress bar
  • Loading state with spinner
  • Appropriate button text for different states

However, there's an opportunity to refactor the button content to reduce repetition:

-Button onClick={handleTriggerAssessment} disabled={isAssessmentDisabled} className="w-full">
-  {loading ? (
-    <>
-      <Loader2 className="mr-2 h-4 w-4 animate-spin" />
-      Evaluating your code...
-    </>
-  ) : hasPassed ? (
-    <>
-      <CheckCircle2 className="mr-2 h-4 w-4" />
-      Assessment Passed
-    </>
-  ) : (
-    <>
-      <RefreshCw className="mr-2 h-4 w-4" />
-      Start Assessment
-    </>
-  )}
-</Button>
+Button onClick={handleTriggerAssessment} disabled={isAssessmentDisabled} className="w-full">
+  {(() => {
+    const config = loading 
+      ? { icon: <Loader2 className="mr-2 h-4 w-4 animate-spin" />, text: "Evaluating your code..." }
+      : hasPassed
+      ? { icon: <CheckCircle2 className="mr-2 h-4 w-4" />, text: "Assessment Passed" }
+      : { icon: <RefreshCw className="mr-2 h-4 w-4" />, text: "Start Assessment" };
+    
+    return (
+      <>
+        {config.icon}
+        {config.text}
+      </>
+    );
+  })()}
+</Button>

19-20: Consider formatting the state destructuring

The static analysis hints suggest formatting the destructuring of state from useChallengeStore. Consider breaking this into multiple lines for better readability:

-const { attempts, maxAttempts, feedback, hasPassed, setAttempts, setMaxAttempts, setFeedback, setHasPassed } =
-    useChallengeStore()
+const {
+  attempts,
+  maxAttempts,
+  feedback,
+  hasPassed,
+  setAttempts,
+  setMaxAttempts,
+  setFeedback,
+  setHasPassed,
+} = useChallengeStore()
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Client Linting Report

[failure] 19-20: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L19-L20
[prettier/prettier] Replace ·attempts,·maxAttempts,·feedback,·hasPassed,·setAttempts,·setMaxAttempts,·setFeedback,·setHasPassed·}·=⏎··· with ⏎····attempts,⏎····maxAttempts,⏎····feedback,⏎····hasPassed,⏎····setAttempts,⏎····setMaxAttempts,⏎····setFeedback,⏎····setHasPassed,⏎··}·=

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 120f96c and e2d9cb9.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/routes/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/sidebar/index.tsx (0 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/RepositoryInfo.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/ChallengePage.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/sidebar/index.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/routes/index.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (3)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx (1) (1)
  • useChallengeStore (22-35)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx (1) (1)
  • useChallengeStore (22-35)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/ChallengePage.tsx (5)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx (1) (1)
  • useChallengeStore (22-35)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/queries/getStudentInfo.ts (1) (1)
  • getStudentInfo (1-17)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx (1) (1)
  • GitHubHandleInput (16-83)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/RepositoryInfo.tsx (1) (1)
  • RepositoryInfo (7-24)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx (1) (1)
  • AssessmentPanel (17-124)
🪛 GitHub Check: Client Linting Report
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx

[failure] 25-25: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx#L25
[prettier/prettier] Replace "Please·enter·your·GitHub·username·to·continue" with 'Please·enter·your·GitHub·username·to·continue'


[failure] 26-26: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx#L26
[prettier/prettier] Replace "destructive" with 'destructive'


[failure] 36-36: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx#L36
[prettier/prettier] Replace "Repository·created" with 'Repository·created'

clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx

[failure] 1-1: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L1
[prettier/prettier] Replace "react" with 'react'


[failure] 2-2: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L2
[prettier/prettier] Replace "../zustand/useChallengeStore" with '../zustand/useChallengeStore'


[failure] 3-3: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L3
[prettier/prettier] Replace "../network/queries/triggerAssessment" with '../network/queries/triggerAssessment'


[failure] 4-4: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L4
[prettier/prettier] Replace "../network/queries/getStudentInfo" with '../network/queries/getStudentInfo'


[failure] 5-5: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L5
[prettier/prettier] Replace "@/hooks/use-toast" with '@/hooks/use-toast'


[failure] 6-6: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L6
[prettier/prettier] Replace "@/components/ui/button" with '@/components/ui/button'


[failure] 7-7: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L7
[prettier/prettier] Replace "@/components/ui/progress" with '@/components/ui/progress'


[failure] 8-8: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L8
[prettier/prettier] Replace "@/components/ui/alert" with '@/components/ui/alert'


[failure] 9-9: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L9
[prettier/prettier] Replace "@/components/ui/badge" with '@/components/ui/badge'


[failure] 10-10: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L10
[prettier/prettier] Replace "lucide-react" with 'lucide-react'


[failure] 19-20: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L19-L20
[prettier/prettier] Replace ·attempts,·maxAttempts,·feedback,·hasPassed,·setAttempts,·setMaxAttempts,·setFeedback,·setHasPassed·}·=⏎··· with ⏎····attempts,⏎····maxAttempts,⏎····feedback,⏎····hasPassed,⏎····setAttempts,⏎····setMaxAttempts,⏎····setFeedback,⏎····setHasPassed,⏎··}·=


[failure] 42-42: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L42
[prettier/prettier] Replace "Assessment·completed" with 'Assessment·completed'


[failure] 43-43: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L43
[prettier/prettier] Replace "Your·code·has·been·evaluated.·Check·the·results·below." with 'Your·code·has·been·evaluated.·Check·the·results·below.'

clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx

[failure] 14-14: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx#L14
[prettier/prettier] Replace coursePhaseParticipation:·CoursePhaseParticipationWithStudent with ⏎····coursePhaseParticipation:·CoursePhaseParticipationWithStudent,⏎··


[failure] 19-19: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx#L19
[prettier/prettier] Delete ;


[failure] 34-34: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx#L34
[prettier/prettier] Delete ·


[failure] 35-35: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/zustand/useChallengeStore.tsx#L35
[prettier/prettier] Insert

🔇 Additional comments (12)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/RepositoryInfo.tsx (2)

3-5: Props interface is appropriately simple.

The interface correctly defines the repoUrl prop as a required string.


7-24: Component implementation is clean and accessible.

The component properly renders the repository URL with appropriate styling and accessibility attributes. The external link correctly includes target="_blank" and rel="noopener noreferrer" for security.

clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/ChallengePage.tsx (4)

12-16: Properly handles missing Phase ID parameter.

The component correctly validates the required phaseId URL parameter and throws an error if it's missing.


24-51: Well-structured data fetching with proper error handling.

The useEffect hook correctly fetches student information when the component mounts. The error handling is comprehensive with appropriate conditional error display, and the loading state is properly managed.


61-77: Effective conditional rendering based on application state.

The conditional rendering logic appropriately shows a loading indicator, GitHub handle input, or repository information and assessment panel based on the current state.


74-75:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Potential issue with missing githubHandle value.

When rendering the AssessmentPanel, the githubHandle state is passed, but if the repository was created in a previous session, this value might be empty. The AssessmentPanel component might require this value for assessment operations.

Verify whether the githubHandle is essential for the AssessmentPanel component's functionality. If it's required for API calls but might be missing in some scenarios, consider extracting the handle from the repository URL or implementing another way to retrieve it.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if AssessmentPanel requires githubHandle for API calls
rg -A 10 "githubHandle.*phaseId" clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx

Length of output: 121


Below is a new shell script to search for any occurrences of githubHandle as well as its definition in the prop types for the AssessmentPanel component. This should help us verify whether the prop is actually used in API calls or other logic inside the component:

#!/bin/bash
echo "Searching for 'githubHandle' occurrences in AssessmentPanel.tsx:"
rg "githubHandle" clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx

echo ""
echo "Checking for 'AssessmentPanelProps' interface in AssessmentPanel.tsx:"
rg "interface AssessmentPanelProps" clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx

Please run this script and share its output for further verification.

clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx (3)

10-14: Props interface is well-defined.

The interface clearly defines the required props with appropriate types.


21-50: Repository creation logic has proper validation and error handling.

The function correctly validates user input, manages loading state, and handles success/error cases with appropriate user feedback.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Client Linting Report

[failure] 25-25: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx#L25
[prettier/prettier] Replace "Please·enter·your·GitHub·username·to·continue" with 'Please·enter·your·GitHub·username·to·continue'


[failure] 26-26: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx#L26
[prettier/prettier] Replace "destructive" with 'destructive'


[failure] 36-36: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GitHubHandleInput.tsx#L36
[prettier/prettier] Replace "Repository·created" with 'Repository·created'


52-82: UI implementation is user-friendly with appropriate visual feedback.

The component provides clear instructions to users and visual feedback during loading states. The button is properly disabled when appropriate.

clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx (3)

17-23: Clean implementation of component setup and state management

The component is well-structured with clear props interface and appropriate state management. Using both the Zustand store for global state and local state for UI loading is a good practice.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Client Linting Report

[failure] 19-20: clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx#L19-L20
[prettier/prettier] Replace ·attempts,·maxAttempts,·feedback,·hasPassed,·setAttempts,·setMaxAttempts,·setFeedback,·setHasPassed·}·=⏎··· with ⏎····attempts,⏎····maxAttempts,⏎····feedback,⏎····hasPassed,⏎····setAttempts,⏎····setMaxAttempts,⏎····setFeedback,⏎····setHasPassed,⏎··}·=


57-63: Good defensive programming with undefined checks

The calculation of attemptsRemaining and attemptsUsedPercentage properly handles undefined values, which prevents runtime errors when data is still loading or unavailable. The disabled state logic is also well-implemented.


116-122: Good use of conditional rendering for feedback alert

The feedback alert is only shown when needed (when feedback exists and the assessment hasn't been passed). Using whitespace-pre-line for the feedback description is a nice touch to preserve formatting from server responses.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/triggerAssessment.ts (2)

17-20: Consider enhancing error handling with more specific information.

The current error handling logs the entire error object to the console and rethrows it. Consider adding more context about the specific operation that failed to make debugging easier.

  } catch (err) {
-    console.error(err)
+    console.error(`Failed to trigger assessment for course phase ${coursePhaseID}:`, err)
    throw err
  }

3-5: Add JSDoc comments for better documentation.

Adding JSDoc comments would improve the documentation of this function, making it easier for other developers to understand its purpose and usage.

+/**
+ * Triggers an assessment for a specific course phase.
+ * @param coursePhaseID - The ID of the course phase to trigger the assessment for
+ * @returns A promise that resolves to the assessment result
+ */
export const triggerAssessment = async (
  coursePhaseID: string,
): Promise<string> => {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77bf7ee and 87b56b0.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/DeveloperProfile.ts (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/triggerAssessment.ts (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useTriggerAssessment.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/interfaces/DeveloperProfile.ts
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useTriggerAssessment.ts
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: lint-clients / lint-clients
🔇 Additional comments (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/triggerAssessment.ts (1)

11-11:

✅ Verification successful

Verify the unusual Content-Type header.

The Content-Type application/json-path+json is an uncommon media type. Most APIs use application/json. Please verify this is the correct Content-Type expected by the server.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search the codebase for other instances of this content type to confirm if it's used consistently
rg -A 2 -B 2 "application/json-path\+json" --type ts

Length of output: 16141


Content-Type Verification — Usage is Consistent

The repository shows consistent use of the custom header "application/json-path+json" across several modules. This suggests that the custom media type is an intentional design choice. However, please double-check with the server specifications to ensure that this non-standard Content-Type is expected and handled correctly.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (1)

1-65: Consider adding accessibility improvements.

While the component functions well, consider enhancing accessibility with:

  • aria-labels on the input field
  • Form element with proper submit handling instead of direct button click
  • Focus management after success/error states
- <div className='flex space-x-2'>
+ <form className='flex space-x-2' onSubmit={(e) => { e.preventDefault(); repositoryMutation.mutate(handle); }}>
  <div className='relative flex-1'>
    <Input
      placeholder='GitHub username'
+     aria-label='GitHub username'
      value={handle}
      onChange={(e) => setHandle(e.target.value)}
      className='pl-9'
    />
  </div>
  <Button
-   onClick={() => repositoryMutation.mutate(handle)}
+   type='submit'
    disabled={!handle || repositoryMutation.isPending}
    className='min-w-[120px]'
  >
    {repositoryMutation.isPending ? (
      <>
        <Loader2 className='mr-2 h-4 w-4 animate-spin' />
        Creating
      </>
    ) : (
      'Create'
    )}
  </Button>
- </div>
+ </form>
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useCreateRepository.ts (3)

4-4: Unused import detected.

The useDevOpsChallengeStore is imported but not used in this hook.

- import { useDevOpsChallengeStore } from '../../zustand/useDevOpsChallengeStore'

11-11: Consider handling empty values more explicitly.

The current implementation uses nullish coalescing for potentially undefined values, which works but could be more explicit.

- mutationFn: (githubUsername?: string) => createRepository(githubUsername ?? '', phaseId ?? ''),
+ mutationFn: (githubUsername?: string) => {
+   if (!phaseId) {
+     throw new Error('No phase ID found in URL parameters');
+   }
+   return createRepository(githubUsername || '', phaseId);
+ },

16-23: Consider typing the error object.

The error: any type could be more specific for better type safety.

- onError: (error: any) => {
+ interface ApiError extends Error {
+   response?: {
+     data?: {
+       error?: string
+     }
+   }
+ }
+ 
+ onError: (error: ApiError) => {
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx (3)

19-22: Avoid potential race condition in assessment trigger.

The manual refetch() at line 21 may be redundant and could lead to a race condition. The useTriggerAssessment hook already invalidates the query on success (as seen in the provided code snippet), which automatically triggers a refetch.

const handleTriggerAssessment = () => {
  assessmentMutation.mutate()
-  developerQuery.refetch()
}

54-62: Consider adapting button text based on assessment state.

The button text remains "Trigger Assessment" even when the assessment has been passed. This could be confusing for users who might think they need to trigger the assessment again.

{assessmentMutation.isPending ? (
  <Loader2 className='ml-2 h-4 w-4 animate-spin' />
) : developerQuery.data?.hasPassed ? (
  <CheckCircle2 className='ml-2 h-4 w-4' />
) : (
  <CircleAlert className='ml-2 h-4 w-4' />
)}
-Trigger Assessment
+{assessmentMutation.isPending 
+  ? "Processing..." 
+  : developerQuery.data?.hasPassed 
+    ? "Assessment Passed" 
+    : "Trigger Assessment"}

55-60: Review icon margin placement.

The icons have a left margin (ml-2) but appear before the text, creating space between the left edge of the button and the icon. If the intention is to have space between the icon and the text, consider using mr-2 (margin-right) instead.

-<Loader2 className='ml-2 h-4 w-4 animate-spin' />
+<Loader2 className='mr-2 h-4 w-4 animate-spin' />

-<CheckCircle2 className='ml-2 h-4 w-4' />
+<CheckCircle2 className='mr-2 h-4 w-4' />

-<CircleAlert className='ml-2 h-4 w-4' />
+<CircleAlert className='mr-2 h-4 w-4' />
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 87b56b0 and 77092f0.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/DevOpsChallengePage.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/createRepository.ts (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useCreateRepository.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/createRepository.ts
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/DevOpsChallengePage.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (3)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useCreateRepository.ts (1)
  • useCreateRepository (6-25)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/AssessmentPanel.tsx (2)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useTriggerAssessment.ts (1)
  • useTriggerAssessment (5-24)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useGetDeveloperProfile.ts (1)
  • useGetDeveloperProfile (7-14)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useCreateRepository.ts (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/createRepository.ts (1)
  • createRepository (8-32)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: lint-clients / lint-clients
🔇 Additional comments (10)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (6)

1-7: Import statements look good.

The component imports all necessary dependencies from React, UI components, and the custom hook for creating repositories.


8-13: Component state setup is appropriate.

The component correctly initializes state for error handling and for managing the GitHub username input.


14-23: Clear user guidance in the alert.

The Alert component provides good user guidance, clearly explaining what the user needs to do.


24-47: Input and button implementation is well structured.

The component provides a good user experience with:

  • Input field for GitHub username
  • Button with appropriate disabled state when empty or during pending operations
  • Loading indicator during repository creation

48-53: Error handling looks good.

The component properly displays error messages from the repository creation process.


54-62: Success feedback is clear.

The success alert provides clear feedback to the user when the repository is created successfully.

clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useCreateRepository.ts (4)

1-5: Imports look good.

All necessary dependencies are imported correctly.


6-9: Hook parameter and setup look good.

The hook is well-structured with proper parameter typing and URL parameter extraction.


10-15: Query invalidation logic is appropriate.

The mutation correctly invalidates the developer profile query upon successful repository creation, as mentioned in a previous review comment.


16-23: Error handling is thorough.

The error handling logic properly checks for server error messages and provides fallback messaging.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (5)

31-40: Add form submission handling for keyboard accessibility.

Currently, users can only create a repository by clicking the button. For better accessibility and user experience, consider wrapping this in a form element to handle Enter key presses.

-<div className='space-y-4'>
+<form className='space-y-4' onSubmit={(e) => {
+  e.preventDefault();
+  if (handle && !repositoryMutation.isPending) {
+    repositoryMutation.mutate(handle);
+  }
+}}>
  <div className='relative'>
    <Input
      placeholder='GitHub username'
      value={handle}
      onChange={(e) => setHandle(e.target.value)}
      className='pl-10'
    />
    <Github className='absolute left-3 top-1/2 transform -translate-y-1/2 text-gray-400 w-5 h-5' />
  </div>

Don't forget to close the form tag at the end:

-</div>
+</form>

33-40: Add GitHub username validation.

GitHub usernames have specific format requirements. Consider adding validation before submission to provide immediate feedback to users.

<Input
  placeholder='GitHub username'
  value={handle}
-  onChange={(e) => setHandle(e.target.value)}
+  onChange={(e) => {
+    setHandle(e.target.value);
+    // Clear error when user starts typing again
+    if (error) setError(null);
+  }}
+  aria-label="GitHub username"
  className='pl-10'
/>

41-54: Use type="submit" for the button in a form context.

If you implement the form suggestion, you should update the button to be of type "submit" to ensure proper form behavior when pressing Enter.

<Button
-  onClick={() => repositoryMutation.mutate(handle)}
+  type="submit"
  disabled={!handle || repositoryMutation.isPending}
  className='w-full'
>

9-13: Set focus on the input field on component mount.

For better user experience, the input field should receive focus automatically when the component mounts.

import { useState } from 'react'
+import { useEffect, useRef } from 'react'
import { Button } from '@/components/ui/button'
// other imports...

export const GithubUsernameInput = (): JSX.Element => {
  const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null)
  const repositoryMutation = useCreateRepository(setError)
  const [handle, setHandle] = useState('')
+  const inputRef = useRef<HTMLInputElement>(null)
+  
+  useEffect(() => {
+    // Focus the input field when component mounts
+    inputRef.current?.focus()
+  }, [])

Then add the ref to the Input component:

<Input
  placeholder='GitHub username'
  value={handle}
  onChange={(e) => setHandle(e.target.value)}
  className='pl-10'
+  ref={inputRef}
/>

57-73: Good error and success handling.

The component appropriately displays error and success states. Consider adding a button to retry or reset in the error state for better user experience.

{repositoryMutation.isError && error && (
  <Alert variant='destructive'>
    <AlertCircle className='h-4 w-4' />
    <AlertTitle>Error</AlertTitle>
    <AlertDescription>{error}</AlertDescription>
+    <Button 
+      variant="outline" 
+      className="mt-2" 
+      onClick={() => setError(null)}
+    >
+      Try Again
+    </Button>
  </Alert>
)}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2922c71 and a704959.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useCreateRepository.ts (1)
  • useCreateRepository (6-25)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: lint-clients / lint-clients
🔇 Additional comments (2)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (2)

1-8: The imports look good and appropriate for the component.

The component imports the necessary UI components and hooks for its functionality.


14-30: Well-structured UI with clear user guidance.

The component has a well-designed UI with clear instructions for the user, which is excellent for user experience.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useCreateRepository.ts (4)

5-8: Hook implementation looks good, but consider adding input validation.

The hook correctly retrieves the phaseId from URL parameters, but there's no validation to ensure it's present and valid before using it. Consider adding validation to avoid making API calls with empty or invalid phase IDs.

export const useCreateRepository = (setError: (error: string | null) => void) => {
  const { phaseId } = useParams<{ phaseId: string }>()
  const queryClient = useQueryClient()
+
+  if (!phaseId) {
+    console.error('Phase ID is missing from URL parameters')
+  }

10-10: Consider validating the githubUsername before making the API call.

Empty string is used as a fallback for undefined githubUsername, which might lead to invalid API calls. Consider validating the input or handling this case differently.

-  mutationFn: (githubUsername?: string) => createRepository(githubUsername ?? '', phaseId ?? ''),
+  mutationFn: (githubUsername?: string) => {
+    if (!githubUsername?.trim()) {
+      throw new Error('GitHub username is required')
+    }
+    return createRepository(githubUsername, phaseId ?? '')
+  },

15-22: Improve error handling with more specific types.

The current error handling uses any type and relies on optional chaining. Consider using a more structured approach with specific error types for better maintainability.

-  onError: (error: any) => {
+  onError: (error: unknown) => {
+    type ErrorResponse = {
+      response?: {
+        data?: {
+          error?: string;
+        };
+      };
+    };
+    
     if (error?.response?.data?.error) {
-      const serverError = error.response.data?.error
+      const serverError = (error as ErrorResponse).response?.data?.error
       setError(serverError)
     } else {
       setError('An unexpected error occurred. Please try again.')
     }
   },

1-24: Consider adding more comprehensive documentation for the hook.

This hook is a key part of the repository creation flow, but lacks documentation explaining its purpose, parameters, and return values. Adding JSDoc comments would improve maintainability.

+/**
+ * Custom hook for creating a repository in the DevOps challenge.
+ * 
+ * @param setError - Function to set error messages in the UI
+ * @returns Mutation object for creating a repository with the specified GitHub username
+ */
export const useCreateRepository = (setError: (error: string | null) => void) => {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a704959 and 3de5a44.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/triggerAssessment.ts (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useCreateRepository.ts (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useGetDeveloperProfile.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useGetDeveloperProfile.ts
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/triggerAssessment.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useCreateRepository.ts (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/createRepository.ts (1)
  • createRepository (8-32)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: lint-clients / lint-clients
🔇 Additional comments (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useCreateRepository.ts (1)

12-13: Potential state management improvement needed.

While invalidating the query is a viable approach to refresh data, a previous reviewer has mentioned that this might introduce redundant state. Consider retrieving the GitHub handle from existing student data instead.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (2)

33-40: Input field accessibility improvement needed.

The input field for GitHub username lacks proper accessibility attributes. While it has a placeholder, it's missing an explicit label or aria-label attribute, which is essential for screen readers.

<div className='relative'>
  <Input
    placeholder='GitHub username'
+   aria-label='GitHub username'
    value={handle}
    onChange={(e) => setHandle(e.target.value)}
    className='pl-10'
  />
  <User className='absolute left-3 top-1/2 transform -translate-y-1/2 text-gray-400 w-5 h-5' />
</div>

10-12: Consider implementing GitHub username validation.

Currently, the component only validates that the input is not empty. Adding pattern validation for GitHub usernames would prevent invalid submissions and improve user experience.

const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null)
const repositoryMutation = useCreateRepository(setError)
const [handle, setHandle] = useState('')
+ const [isValidUsername, setIsValidUsername] = useState(false)
+ 
+ const validateGithubUsername = (username: string) => {
+   // GitHub usernames allow alphanumeric characters and hyphens
+   // Cannot have multiple consecutive hyphens
+   // Cannot begin or end with a hyphen
+   // Length between 1-39 characters
+   const githubUsernameRegex = /^[a-z\d](?:[a-z\d]|-(?=[a-z\d])){0,38}$/i
+   return githubUsernameRegex.test(username)
+ }
+ 
+ const handleUsernameChange = (e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => {
+   const username = e.target.value
+   setHandle(username)
+   setIsValidUsername(validateGithubUsername(username))
+ }

Then update the input's onChange handler and button's disabled condition:

<Input
  placeholder='GitHub username'
  value={handle}
- onChange={(e) => setHandle(e.target.value)}
+ onChange={handleUsernameChange}
  className='pl-10'
/>

<Button
  onClick={() => repositoryMutation.mutate(handle)}
- disabled={!handle || repositoryMutation.isPending}
+ disabled={!handle || !isValidUsername || repositoryMutation.isPending}
  className='w-full'
>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4e0ccf8 and 3dfcce1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useCreateRepository.ts (1)
  • useCreateRepository (5-24)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: lint-clients / lint-clients
🔇 Additional comments (3)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (3)

57-63: Well-implemented error handling.

The error handling implementation is good. It shows meaningful error messages from the server and has proper visual indicators.


65-73: Good success feedback implementation.

The success alert provides clear feedback to the user that their repository has been created successfully, with appropriate styling and guidance for next steps.


1-77: Overall well-structured component with clear separation of concerns.

The component is well-organized with appropriate state management, UI elements, and conditional rendering based on operation status. The use of the custom hook useCreateRepository for handling the repository creation logic separates concerns effectively.

Copy link
Contributor

@niclasheun niclasheun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

noch die zwei Kleinigkeiten und dann passt es fürs erste für mich.

Wir sollten es dann mal auf prod testen und die woche nochmal an der UI arbeiten.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (2)

33-40: Consider enhancing the username input for accessibility and validation.

While the input field works functionally, consider these improvements:

  1. Add a proper label element linked to the input for better accessibility
  2. Implement basic validation for GitHub username format (alphanumeric characters, hyphens, cannot begin with a hyphen)
  3. Consider providing feedback on validation before submission
- <div className='relative'>
+ <div className='relative'>
+   <label htmlFor="github-username" className="sr-only">GitHub Username</label>
    <Input
+     id="github-username"
      placeholder='GitHub username'
      value={githubUsername}
      onChange={(e) => setGithubUsername(e.target.value)}
+     aria-describedby="username-description"
      className='pl-10'
    />
+   <span id="username-description" className="text-xs text-gray-500 mt-1">
+     Enter your GitHub username to create a repository.
+   </span>
    <User className='absolute left-3 top-1/2 transform -translate-y-1/2 text-gray-400 w-5 h-5' />
  </div>

57-63: Error handling implementation is effective.

The error display is implemented well, showing a destructive alert with the error message from the API. For a future enhancement, consider implementing a mapping of technical error messages to more user-friendly messages.

{repositoryMutation.isError && error && (
  <Alert variant='destructive'>
    <AlertCircle className='h-4 w-4' />
    <AlertTitle>Error</AlertTitle>
-   <AlertDescription>{error}</AlertDescription>
+   <AlertDescription>
+     {error.includes("already exists") 
+       ? "A repository for this challenge already exists for your account." 
+       : error}
+   </AlertDescription>
  </Alert>
)}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5ffcde and 93b837a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (1 hunks)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/createRepository.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/network/mutations/createRepository.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (1)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/pages/hooks/useCreateRepository.ts (1)
  • useCreateRepository (5-24)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: build-servers / core / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-server-core
  • GitHub Check: build-servers / intro-course / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-server-intro-course
  • GitHub Check: build-servers / core / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-server-core
  • GitHub Check: build-servers / intro-course / Build Docker Image for ghcr.io/ls1intum/prompt2/prompt-server-intro-course
  • GitHub Check: lint-clients / lint-clients
🔇 Additional comments (4)
clients/devops_challenge_component/src/devops_challenge/components/GithubUsernameInput.tsx (4)

9-13: Component initialization looks good!

The component correctly uses React hooks for state management and integrates with the useCreateRepository mutation hook. The naming choice of githubUsername is appropriate and consistent with React naming conventions.


41-55: Button implementation is well-designed with appropriate loading states.

The button correctly:

  • Shows a loading spinner during repository creation
  • Disables when the username is empty or when a request is in progress
  • Provides clear text indication of the current state

65-73: Success state UI provides good user feedback.

The success alert is well-designed with appropriate styling and clear messaging to guide the user on next steps. The green color scheme effectively communicates success.


1-78:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Overall component structure is well-implemented.

The component has a clean structure with good separation of concerns. It handles input, validation, API interaction, and various UI states appropriately. Adding unit tests for this component would be beneficial for long-term maintainability.

Consider implementing tests to verify:

  1. Input validation behavior
  2. Button disabling conditions
  3. Error and success states display correctly

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any test files for this component
fd "GithubUsernameInput.test" --type f

Length of output: 38


Component Structure is Solid – Please Verify Test Coverage

The component is well-organized and clearly separates concerns, handling input changes, API interactions, and state transitions effectively. However, our search did not locate any related test files (e.g., with the naming patterns .test), so it appears that dedicated unit tests for this component are missing. To ensure long-term maintainability, please verify or add tests that cover the following areas:

  • Input validation behavior.
  • Button disabling logic when no username is provided or during pending API operations.
  • Proper rendering of error and success alert states.

Please confirm manually whether tests might exist under an alternate naming scheme or add the necessary tests.

@rappm
Copy link
Contributor

rappm commented Mar 24, 2025

Sobald #310 gemerged ist sollte der Linting Bug Gefixed sein, dann einfach hier nochmal main reinmergen

@rappm rappm temporarily deployed to prompt-dev-vm March 24, 2025 22:02 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Copy link
Contributor

@rappm rappm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice

@Mtze Mtze merged commit f67911d into main Mar 25, 2025
54 checks passed
@Mtze Mtze deleted the 244-devops-challenge-trigger-challenge-assessment branch March 25, 2025 08:44
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in PROMPT Mar 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DevOps Challenge: Trigger Challenge Assessment
4 participants