Issues

• Error: "unsupported feature encryption used in entry"

  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#295 · Filter by author x-dennis-x opened on Jan 12, 2023

• Processor usage limit (mainly on) Linux

  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#294 · Filter by author jozefduhacek opened on Nov 8, 2022

• Logpresso does not touch MANIFEST files?

  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#293 · Filter by author ghost opened on Jul 25, 2022

• log4j 2.18 has been released

  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#292 · Filter by author philrandal opened on Jul 12, 2022

• Oracle not vulnerable?

  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#291 · Filter by author fordchr01 opened on Jun 6, 2022

• CVE-2021-45046 not being detected by Logspresso

  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#290 · Filter by author chimera999 opened on May 27, 2022

• Cannot fix CVE-2021-44832 upgrade it

  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#289 · Filter by author bcraigie opened on May 16, 2022
  1

• Is it necessary to run the tool every boot?

  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#288 · Filter by author Zeev86 opened on May 10, 2022

• Spring Framework for Java vulnerable to remote code execution CVE-2022-22965

  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#285 · Filter by author doctore74 opened on Apr 1, 2022
  9

  

• modify the report

  discussion
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#283 · Filter by author seppelinchen opened on Mar 9, 2022
  5

  

• Scanning has side effects on running java.exe?

  discussion
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#282 · Filter by author koppenho opened on Mar 3, 2022
  1

  

• Request: Reporting in Zabbix

  discussion
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#281 · Filter by author rvtkruys-valtech opened on Feb 28, 2022
  2

  

• False positive detection for CVE-2021-44228

  discussion
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#280 · Filter by author greg-michael opened on Feb 17, 2022
  1

  

• Additional output of secure log4j Versions

  enhancementpatch released
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#273 · Filter by author OrbbQ3 opened on Feb 8, 2022
  7

  

• Scanner crashes with -Xmx option and very low memory limits

  discussion
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#272 · Filter by author thl-cmk opened on Feb 5, 2022
  2

  

• logpresso identifies CVE-2021-4104 in reload4j

  discussionpatch released
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#271 · Filter by author fipro78 opened on Feb 4, 2022
  6

  

• sonarqube results

  discussion
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#268 · Filter by author k3it opened on Feb 2, 2022
  3

  

• Clarifications for "Potentially Vulnerable" for CVE-2021-44228

  discussionpatch released
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#266 · Filter by author JStevens1855 opened on Feb 1, 2022
  13

  

• Extra sign for "potentially vulnerable" "[*] Found"

  discussion
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#264 · Filter by author WWIJP opened on Feb 1, 2022
  8

  

• Wrong counting values of found files (mitigated)

  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#263 · Filter by author WWIJP opened on Feb 1, 2022

• Addressing CVE-2022-23302, CVE-2022-23305 and CVE-2022-23307

  enhancementpatch released
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#259 · Filter by author jamesdpatterson opened on Jan 27, 2022
  3

  

• Permissions not preserved in a JAR within a ZIP

  bug
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#255 · Filter by author mrpegman opened on Jan 20, 2022
  2

  

• incorrectly flagging embedded jar file as effected

  enhancementpatch released
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#246 · Filter by author bvallabhaneni opened on Jan 13, 2022
  2

  

• Not an issue but maybe a feature request

  enhancement
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#245 · Filter by author JStevens1855 opened on Jan 13, 2022

• Better build instructions

  discussion
  logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner#244 · Filter by author louigi600 opened on Jan 13, 2022
  2