-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 189
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update go-libp2p to latest #578
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please dont change this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Out of curiosity, I would like to know why this introduces a bug. It seems to me that the purpose of this code is to create a stopped timer. The line immediately above the call to stop creates a timer with a timeout of 1 hour, so it is not conceivable that the timer's channel should ever need to be cleared.
Further, even if it were possible for more than an hour to elapse between these two consecutive lines of code, reading from the timer's channel would be a bug in go 1.23+, since trying to read from a timer's channel following a call to
Stop
will block forever.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
read more carefully, if Stop returns false you got to drain it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did try to read carefully, Here it says this:
Sorry if I am missing something.
FYI: Here is a way to handle the situation if multiple versions of go need to Stop and reuse timers:
https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/pull/4659/files
That one hour timeout does a good job of ensuring that the immediately following call to
Stop
will never returnfalse
, so no need to drain even with go < 1.23.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so they changed semantics for go 1.23 so as to break existing code that was following their recommemdations? Gross.
Ok fine, but still remove it from this pr and open a new one separately to have visibility and set the minimum version to 1.23; i dont like the 1hr workaround.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am trying to get a small repro to see if it's actually a golang bug. Ideally
timer.Stop
shouldn't return false if we haven't read anything.The state of the draft PR https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/pull/4659/files is correct though. You can rely on the capacity of the channel to handle this case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it can (at least before 1.23) return false if the timer has fired.
At any rate, lets make a separate pr for this and limit this one to the go-libp2p upgrade.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes and it does.
From go1.23, it shouldn't.