documentation improvements #567
Conversation
|
Thanks @ManuelHu for working on this! @legend-exp/remage-software please help with the review of the docs. |
| physics constructors. It mostly is based on the physics list implemented in | ||
| _MaGe_. It combines: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would not reference MaGe, in the end it's fairly standard. also we might revise it soon
| Penelope, polarized) | ||
| - Optional **optical physics** (scintillation, Cherenkov, absorption, Rayleigh, | ||
| WLS) | ||
| - Configurable **hadronic physics lists**, including high-precision neutron |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think "high-precision" is the right adjective here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
okay, I checked. NeutronHP really means high-precision neutrons
| setting this efficiency as in the stock process. This also matches our | ||
| expectation, as we do not expect that the emission of multiple photons in a WLS | ||
| material should be described by a Poisson distribution. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would rather remind that the G4 model is poisson, but in general this is not a good assumption as most materials can emit max 1 photon (i.e. bernoulli distribution), so we offer this option
| | Option | Description | | ||
| | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | | ||
| | `None` | No hadronic physics (**default**) | | ||
| | `QGSP_BIC_HP` | Quark-Gluon String + Binary Cascade + HP neutrons | | ||
| | `QGSP_BERT_HP` | QGSP with Bertini cascade + HP neutrons | | ||
| | `FTFP_BERT_HP` | Fritiof string model + Bertini + HP neutrons | | ||
| | `Shielding` | Optimized shielding list with HP neutrons (default) | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I hope this is correct. is there a G4 page we can link?
| <project:../rmg-commands.md#rmgprocessesusegrabmayrsgammacascades>, _remage_ | ||
| replaces the standard neutron capture process (`nCapture`) with a custom one | ||
| that will generate gamma cascaded for specific isotopes from files as provided | ||
| by P. Grabmayr _et al._. For all other isotopes, this process exactly behaves |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We need to reference literature here. Help @MoritzNeuberger
|
(just for reference: I mark the comments as resolved when I resolved them locally, I will push later) |
|
Could you also add a warning box in the docs regarding the performance of |
2 participants
No description provided.