Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[wasm] Bump chrome for testing - linux: 117.0.5938.132, windows: 117.0.5938.132 #1

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2023

No description provided.

lateralusX pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
Fixes dotnet#95367.

Relevant part of the JitDump:

```
Using `if true` assertions from pred BB02
Assertions in: #1
fgMorphTree BB04, STMT00021 (before)
               [000070] DA---------                         *  STORE_LCL_VAR ubyte  V10 tmp9
               [000057] -----------                         \--*  CAST      int <- ubyte <- int
               [000006] -----------                            \--*  EQ        int
               [000004] -----------                               +--*  LCL_VAR   ref    V02 tmp1          (last use)
               [000055] H----------                               \--*  CNS_INT(h) ref     'Frozen EmptyPartition`1<Int32> object'

Assertion prop for index #1 in BB04:
               [000006] -----------                         *  EQ        int
GenTreeNode creates assertion:
               [000070] DA---+-----                         *  STORE_LCL_VAR ubyte  V10 tmp9
In BB04 New Local Constant Assertion: V10 == [0000000000000001], index = #2

fgMorphTree BB04, STMT00021 (after)
               [000070] DA---+-----                         *  STORE_LCL_VAR ubyte  V10 tmp9
               [000055] H----+-----                         \--*  CNS_INT(h) int
```

The JitDump is unfinished because the compiler crashes when trying to dump the last line. Clearly, the `CNS_INT` is no longer a handle at that point because we just bashed it to a constant 1.
lateralusX pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2025
* JIT: Introduce `LclVarDsc::lvIsMultiRegDest`

With recent work to expand returned promoted locals into `FIELD_LIST`
the only "whole references" of promoted locals we should see is when
stored from a multi-reg node. This is the only knowledge the backend
should need for correctness purposes, so introduce a bit to track this
property, and switch the backend to check this instead.

The existing `lvIsMultiRegRet` is essentially this + whether the local
is returned. We should be able to remove this, but it is currently used
for some heuristics in old promotion, so keep it around for now.

* JIT: Add some more constant folding in lowering

Add folding for shifts and certain binops that are now getting produced
late due to returned `FIELD_LIST` nodes.

win-arm64 example:
```csharp
[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.NoInlining)]
static ValueTask<byte> Foo()
{
    return new ValueTask<byte>(123);
}
```

```diff
 G_M17084_IG02:  ;; offset=0x0008
             mov     x0, xzr
-            mov     w1, #1
-            mov     w2, wzr
-            mov     w3, dotnet#123
-            orr     w2, w2, w3,  LSL dotnet#16
-            orr     w1, w2, w1,  LSL dotnet#24
-						;; size=24 bbWeight=1 PerfScore 4.00
+            mov     w1, #0x17B0000
+						;; size=8 bbWeight=1 PerfScore 1.00
```

* Feedback
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants