feat: add basic checkpoint support - #2270
Open
lonless9 wants to merge 18 commits into
Open
Conversation
Spark 3.5.7 Test ReportCommit Information
Test Summary
Test DetailsError CountsPassed Tests Diff(empty) Failed Tests |
Spark 4.1.1 Test ReportCommit Information
Test Summary
Test DetailsError CountsPassed Tests Diff(empty) Failed Tests(truncated) |
Ibis Test ReportCommit Information
Test Summary
Test DetailsError CountsPassed Tests Diff--- before.txt 2026-07-24 09:42:10.720489513 +0000
+++ after.txt 2026-07-24 09:42:11.004491959 +0000
@@ -531,0 +532 @@
+ibis/backends/tests/test_export.py::test_table_to_csv[pyspark]
@@ -756,0 +758 @@
+ibis/backends/tests/test_generic.py::test_uncorrelated_subquery[pyspark]Failed Tests |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2270 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 79.45% 77.56% -1.90%
==========================================
Files 909 914 +5
Lines 171731 175014 +3283
==========================================
- Hits 136452 135741 -711
- Misses 35279 39273 +3994
*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.
... and 69 files with indirect coverage changes 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
lonless9
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 22, 2026 12:07
linhr
reviewed
Jul 24, 2026
# Conflicts: # Cargo.lock
lonless9
added
run spark tests
|
@lonless9 I've been interested in this for a while, esp for iterative processing. I've been using a manual in memory write/read cycle till now to deal with that. Would you find it useful at this stage for me to run any kind of "stress" testing on some jobs I have where checkpointing has been a challenge, or are you still iterating on this PR? |
Contributor
|
@jordantgh Thanks for reaching out! The testing would be super valuable. We plan to include this PR in the upcoming release next week, and you can try that out and see how it goes. We'd love to hear from you. Your feedback would help us a lot when we iterate on the design once the initial version is out. |
Contributor
Author
|
@jordantgh I'm wrapping up this PR. If the release build takes too long, the debug mode should also show meaningful improvements. Thanks for being involved! |
Cheers, I did check out the branch and do some testing but it will be cleaner on the release and can report back anything in an issue then, if that sounds sensible. |
Contributor
Author
|
@jordantgh Sounds great! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.