Skip to content

Conversation

@wl-smith
Copy link
Contributor

Issue: https://lacework.atlassian.net/browse/RAIN-55293

Description:
This is to drive feature parity with AWS for agentless workload scanning. Currently AWS Organization integrations allow for a customer to provide an account mapping file that maps to lacework sub-accounts. This is Part #2 in enabling that for GCP Agentless via terraform. Part #1 was to add the Account Mapping field to the go-sdk for Gcp Agentless.

Changes:

  • Add account mapping field to gcp scanning resource
  • Add functionality to update the account mapping accordingly
  • Add functionality to the account_mapping_helper to look for either "gcp_projects" for the list of gcp projects or "aws_accounts" for the list of aws_accounts according to the type of integration.
  • Add new integration test for GCP Org and updated example for GCP Org

@wl-smith wl-smith force-pushed the add-acct-mapping-handling-gcp-agentless branch 5 times, most recently from e8ce270 to a77330b Compare August 10, 2023 18:30
@wl-smith wl-smith marked this pull request as ready for review August 10, 2023 18:33
@wl-smith wl-smith requested a review from a team as a code owner August 10, 2023 18:33
@wl-smith wl-smith force-pushed the add-acct-mapping-handling-gcp-agentless branch 23 times, most recently from 56f08f1 to 7efdb65 Compare August 16, 2023 01:09
@wl-smith wl-smith force-pushed the add-acct-mapping-handling-gcp-agentless branch 13 times, most recently from 807ee13 to 6b875ad Compare August 21, 2023 18:54
@wl-smith wl-smith force-pushed the add-acct-mapping-handling-gcp-agentless branch 3 times, most recently from acbf0d5 to a1eb19e Compare August 24, 2023 14:55
@wl-smith wl-smith force-pushed the add-acct-mapping-handling-gcp-agentless branch from 3e32c9e to 7629466 Compare October 5, 2023 20:02
@wl-smith wl-smith force-pushed the add-acct-mapping-handling-gcp-agentless branch from 7629466 to 351c29e Compare October 5, 2023 20:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants