Skip to content

[WIP] Audit privacy-boundary and leakage risks in Meshspaces planning#56

Closed
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
copilot/audit-meshspaces-privacy-boundary
Closed

[WIP] Audit privacy-boundary and leakage risks in Meshspaces planning#56
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
copilot/audit-meshspaces-privacy-boundary

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Apr 1, 2026

Thanks for asking me to work on this. I will get started on it and keep this PR's description up to date as I form a plan and make progress.


This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>[Copilot Planning] Meshspaces privacy-boundary and cross-context leakage audit</issue_title>
<issue_description>Context: We are planning Meshspaces for Canopy: one machine managing multiple fully isolated mesh runtimes via a thin shell. This issue is for planning/review support against the repo as it exists today. We are not implementing Meshspaces in this issue.

Goal: Identify privacy-boundary failures, hidden cross-context leakage risks, and UI/shell conveniences that would quietly undermine isolation.

Focus areas:

  • browser state collisions (cookies, localStorage, session, CSRF, notifications)
  • shell-level previews and shared-screen leakage risk
  • wrong-mesh actions caused by stale state or ambiguous context
  • machine-local vs shell-local vs mesh-local data confusion
  • invite import and mesh label/GUID collision risks
  • child-runtime vs shell trust boundary

Expected deliverable:

  • Open a PR from a Copilot branch with a concise findings report in docs/meshspaces-review/privacy-boundary-audit.md
  • If helpful, make small doc/spec clarifications only. Do not start Meshspaces implementation.

Ground rules:

  • Do not implement multi-mesh runtime behavior.
  • Prefer findings, checklists, and doc clarifications over code changes.
  • If you identify missing tests or APIs, document them rather than building the feature.
  • Prioritise privacy and scope-boundary failures over convenience.</issue_description>

<agent_instructions>This is a planning and review task, not a Meshspaces implementation task. Work against the repository as it exists today. Prefer findings reports, doc updates, edge-case analysis, and concrete API/UI/permission recommendations over product code changes. Do not start building Meshspaces. Prioritise privacy, security, onboarding, wrong-target risk, migration safety, and explicit per-mesh targeting requirements.</agent_instructions>

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)

@kwalus kwalus closed this Apr 1, 2026
@kwalus kwalus deleted the copilot/audit-meshspaces-privacy-boundary branch April 1, 2026 17:21
Copilot AI requested a review from kwalus April 1, 2026 17:32
Copilot stopped work on behalf of kwalus due to an error April 1, 2026 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Copilot Planning] Meshspaces privacy-boundary and cross-context leakage audit

2 participants