Skip to content

Do not remove healthy nodes from partially failing zero-or-max-scaling node groups #8291

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

adamoldak
Copy link

@adamoldak adamoldak commented Jul 3, 2025

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

The PR changes scale-up behavior for ZeroOrMaxNodeScaling node groups. Currently all nodes from the group are removed if any node has creation errors. In some cases it is needed that such groups are left unmodified unless all their nodes fail.

The KeepPartiallyFailedZeroOrMaxScalingNodeGroups field has been added to NodeGroupAutoscalingOptions to select the appropriate behavior and allow for backward compatibility.

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Change: Allow zero-or-max scale-ups to keep partial node groups with node creation errors.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Jul 3, 2025
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jul 3, 2025

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: adamoldak / name: Adam Oldak (56e6491)

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adamoldak
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign x13n for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 3, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @adamoldak!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/autoscaler 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/autoscaler has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @adamoldak. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 3, 2025
@adamoldak
Copy link
Author

cc @kawych @pwitkiewicz

@adamoldak adamoldak force-pushed the zero_or_max_scaling_scaleup_errors branch 2 times, most recently from abf136b to 9017765 Compare July 10, 2025 09:59
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jul 10, 2025
@adamoldak adamoldak changed the title Do not remove healthy nodes from partially failing zero-or-max-scaling node pool Do not remove healthy nodes from partially failing zero-or-max-scaling node groups Jul 18, 2025
@adamoldak adamoldak force-pushed the zero_or_max_scaling_scaleup_errors branch from 9017765 to 56e6491 Compare July 18, 2025 12:03
@adamoldak adamoldak marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2025 13:01
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 18, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from vadasambar and x13n July 18, 2025 13:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/cluster-autoscaler cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants