Skip to content

Conversation

@wazery
Copy link
Contributor

@wazery wazery commented Sep 1, 2025

This PR introduces an e2e test to validate webhook conversion between versions, as part of the multiversion tutorial e2e tests.

Fixes: #4255

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 1, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 1, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @wazery. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@wazery wazery force-pushed the w-webhook-conversion-e2e-test branch 2 times, most recently from 2fda561 to 681bf43 Compare September 1, 2025 19:56
@wazery wazery marked this pull request as ready for review September 1, 2025 22:16
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 1, 2025
@wazery wazery force-pushed the w-webhook-conversion-e2e-test branch from 681bf43 to d65d418 Compare September 2, 2025 13:19
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 2, 2025
@wazery wazery force-pushed the w-webhook-conversion-e2e-test branch 2 times, most recently from effbdb8 to 6d31a62 Compare September 2, 2025 13:42
@wazery wazery force-pushed the w-webhook-conversion-e2e-test branch 2 times, most recently from 9fab9f8 to 6d8d9f7 Compare September 2, 2025 15:35
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 2, 2025
@wazery wazery force-pushed the w-webhook-conversion-e2e-test branch 3 times, most recently from e79777c to 941df82 Compare September 9, 2025 12:03
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

camilamacedo86 commented Sep 13, 2025

/ok-to-test

Thank you for the contirbution 🥇
But it is not really checking the conversion yet.
See how we do the same in our e2e tests, https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/blob/master/test/e2e/v4/plugin_cluster_test.go#L389-L432

We would need to do something very similar to that.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

Great work 🥇

/lgtm
/approved

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 21, 2025
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/lgtm cancel
/approved cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 21, 2025
Copy link
Member

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coudl you please rebase with master and ensure that you run:

make install
make generate-docs

TO have all updated accordingly?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wazery
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from camilamacedo86. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 21, 2025
@wazery wazery force-pushed the w-webhook-conversion-e2e-test branch from b56b865 to 1361e7e Compare October 21, 2025 19:14
@wazery
Copy link
Contributor Author

wazery commented Oct 21, 2025

make generate-docs

yes I ran them, I also just reran them now and I see no difference in files, the branch is also up to date with master

@wazery wazery force-pushed the w-webhook-conversion-e2e-test branch from 1361e7e to 2891ee8 Compare October 26, 2025 21:14
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/override pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-0

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86: Overrode contexts on behalf of camilamacedo86: pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-0

In response to this:

/override pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@wazery wazery force-pushed the w-webhook-conversion-e2e-test branch from 2891ee8 to 5921329 Compare October 27, 2025 12:56
@wazery
Copy link
Contributor Author

wazery commented Oct 27, 2025

/override pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-1

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wazery: wazery unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators.

In response to this:

/override pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@wazery wazery force-pushed the w-webhook-conversion-e2e-test branch from 5921329 to e7a133f Compare October 27, 2025 19:00
@wazery wazery requested a review from camilamacedo86 October 27, 2025 19:37
@wazery
Copy link
Contributor Author

wazery commented Oct 27, 2025

@camilamacedo86 I just fixed the failing test, hope the PR is ready now for merge.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/override pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-1

/override pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-0

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-1

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • EasyCLA
  • netlify/kubebuilder/deploy-preview
  • pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-32-0
  • pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-33-0
  • pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-0
  • pull-kubebuilder-test
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

In response to this:

/override pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-1

/override pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/override pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-0

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86: Overrode contexts on behalf of camilamacedo86: pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-0

In response to this:

/override pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

- date; echo Hello from the Kubernetes cluster
restartPolicy: OnFailure`

newTextV1 := ` template:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should instead update the places where those values are defined instead
See: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/blob/master/hack/docs/internal/cronjob-tutorial/sample.go#L19-L34

We can replace all this implementation and just update the const.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just addressed it, many thanks for the pointer.

@wazery wazery force-pushed the w-webhook-conversion-e2e-test branch from e7a133f to a305b10 Compare October 27, 2025 20:08
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wazery: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-1 1361e7e link true /test pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-1
pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-0 a305b10 link true /test pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-34-0

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@wazery wazery requested a review from camilamacedo86 October 27, 2025 20:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add e2e test to validate webhook conversion from one version to another

3 participants