Skip to content

Add manifest outputs that split v1 and experimental #1644

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add manifest outputs that split v1 and experimental #1644

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+8 −1

Conversation

learner0810
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add manifest outputs that split v1 and experimental

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes # #1611

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 25, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: learner0810
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign nirrozenbaum for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Sep 25, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @learner0810. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 25, 2025
@netlify Netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for gateway-api-inference-extension ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 23179e6
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/gateway-api-inference-extension/deploys/68d4e25f28f8e200072f2ef3
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1644--gateway-api-inference-extension.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 25, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 25, 2025
@learner0810
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @liu-cong @nirrozenbaum PTAL

liu-cong
liu-cong reviewed Sep 26, 2025
View reviewed changes
site-src/guides/index.md

### Install the Inference Extension CRDs


Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should explain when do you need which CRD.

@kfswain I know GKE has docs on this. Do we have docs of other gateway providers that we can reference here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@danehans danehans Awaiting requested review from danehans

1 more reviewer

@liu-cong liu-cong liu-cong left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@learner0810 @k8s-ci-robot @liu-cong