Skip to content

✨ Add support for AMD SEV-SNP instances #5605

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2025
Merged

✨ Add support for AMD SEV-SNP instances #5605

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2025
+583 −0

Conversation

fangge1212
Copy link
Contributor

@fangge1212 fangge1212 commented Aug 1, 2025 •
edited
Loading

This is another version of #5598
Differences:

  • This pr doesn't validate the instance type for the specific confidential compute technology
  • This pr uses enum type ConfidentialCompute with value AMDEncryptedVirtualizationNestedPaging,Disabled(and TDX in the future) to represent the confidential computing technology.

What type of PR is this?
/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • includes emoji in title
  • adds unit tests

Release note:

Add support for AMD SEV-SNP instances

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. labels Aug 1, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 1, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from fiunchinho August 1, 2025 03:46
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 1, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @fangge1212. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 1, 2025
@fangge1212 fangge1212 mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2025
Closed
5 tasks
@fangge1212 fangge1212 force-pushed the amd_sev_snp_1 branch 3 times, most recently from 934e570 to 3a228e8 Compare August 6, 2025 22:35
damdo
damdo reviewed Aug 8, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for the PR @fangge1212

I left a comment about a pattern to follow for the API types

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 11, 2025
@fangge1212 fangge1212 force-pushed the amd_sev_snp_1 branch 3 times, most recently from ae22824 to 80bf0a3 Compare August 12, 2025 11:11
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 12, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 13, 2025
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Aug 19, 2025

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 19, 2025
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Aug 19, 2025

/assign @nrb

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Sep 8, 2025

@fangge1212 Go 1.24 went in #5652

@fangge1212 fangge1212 force-pushed the amd_sev_snp_1 branch 2 times, most recently from 013e3c5 to ace7982 Compare September 10, 2025 07:02
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 10, 2025
damdo
damdo reviewed Sep 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @fangge1212
a couple of nits but looks great!

@fangge1212
Add support for AMD SEV-SNP instances
058ff2f 
This commit adds support for AMD SEV-SNP instances, so users can
utilize confidential computing technology on cluster nodes.

Signed-off-by: Fangge Jin <[email protected]>
damdo
damdo reviewed Sep 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @fangge1212

/lgtm

/assign @nrb @richardcase @AndiDog @dlipovetsky

For approval

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: f962d5f823f52c0f588f7809348bf12038216408

@fangge1212
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 15, 2025
@fangge1212
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nrb @richardcase @AndiDog @dlipovetsky
Can I get a review on this pr? Then I can move forward to work on openshift repos.

@richardcase
Copy link
Member

/test ?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@richardcase: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-blocking

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-clusterclass

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-conformance

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-conformance-with-ci-artifacts

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks-gc

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks-testing

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main

pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build

pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker

pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-blocking

pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test

pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-verify

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@richardcase
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e

@richardcase
Copy link
Member

Feel free to unhold when the e2e have passed

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 18, 2025
@richardcase
Copy link
Member

From my side:

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: richardcase

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 18, 2025
@fangge1212
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 97cc94c into kubernetes-sigs:main Sep 19, 2025
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@damdo damdo damdo left review comments

@dlipovetsky dlipovetsky Awaiting requested review from dlipovetsky

@fiunchinho fiunchinho Awaiting requested review from fiunchinho

Assignees

@richardcase richardcase

@nrb nrb

@AndiDog AndiDog

@dlipovetsky dlipovetsky

@damdo damdo

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@fangge1212 @k8s-ci-robot @damdo @richardcase @nrb @AndiDog @dlipovetsky