Skip to content

Conversation

Flying-Tom
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 16, 2025

Deploy Preview for kmesh-net ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit be2c0ba
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kmesh-net/deploys/68c8f382f4d13f00087c774c
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-238--kmesh-net.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@kmesh-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign nlgwcy for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Flying-Tom, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the documentation for Locality Load Balancing in Kmesh. The changes aim to provide a more accurate, clear, and user-friendly guide for understanding and configuring locality-based traffic management, ensuring that users can effectively set up and test these features.

Highlights

  • Documentation Clarity: Improved the overall clarity and conciseness of explanations regarding Locality Load Balancing concepts and its implementation within Kmesh.
  • Typo and Formatting Corrections: Addressed minor typos (e.g., 'isito' to 'istio') and refined formatting for code blocks and bullet points to enhance readability.
  • Enhanced Setup and Testing Instructions: Refined the instructions for preparing the environment, assigning locality information to nodes, and conducting test scenarios, making them more precise and easier to follow.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request significantly improves the clarity and readability of the locality load balancing documentation. The changes make the text more concise and the instructions easier to follow. The corrections to code block languages and removal of redundant example output are also great improvements.

I've added one suggestion to maintain consistency in the code block language specifiers. There may be other similar instances that were not part of this diff that could also be updated for consistency.

```

- Start a service instance on the ambient-worker
- Start a service instance on `ambient-worker`:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This is a good clarification. For consistency with other changes in this PR (e.g., on lines 107 and 250), could you also update the language of the following code block from yaml to bash on line 128? The kubectl apply ... <<EOF command is a shell command, so bash is the more appropriate language for syntax highlighting.

kubectl label node ambient-worker3 topology.kubernetes.io/subzone=subzone2 --overwrite
```

Delete helloworld-region.zone2.subzone3 and re-apply the development pod as follows, then run test:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This sentence has been removed, which is a good cleanup. However, the preceding instruction on line 315 now covers relabeling and redeploying, but it's followed by two separate bash code blocks (one for label and one for delete/apply). For better readability, consider merging these into a single bash block or splitting the instruction on line 315 into two separate steps, each with its own code block.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants