Skip to content

Conversation

@subha0319
Copy link

Removes the hardcoded is_visible == True filter from the base incident query when an explicit is_visible filter is provided via CEL. This allows querying for non-visible incidents (e.g., is_visible == false).

Fixes #5376

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

ℹ Additional Information

Removes the hardcoded `is_visible == True` filter from the base incident query when an explicit `is_visible` filter is provided via CEL. This allows querying for non-visible incidents (e.g., `is_visible == false`).

Fixes keephq#5376
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 20, 2025

@subha0319 is attempting to deploy a commit to the KeepHQ Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 20, 2025
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 20, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the Bug Something isn't working label Oct 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Bug Something isn't working size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[🐛 Bug]: Incident is_visible

2 participants