Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
btrfs-progs: docs: add a warning when converting to a profile with lo…
…wer redundancy [BUG] There is a bug report that when deleting a device using sysfs /sys/block/<dev>/device/delete, the kernel module will still try to read and write the device. Normally it's fine as long as all chunks can tolerate that removed device (e.g. all RAID1). But the problem is when one is trying to lower the redundancy by converting to another profile: # mkfs.btrfs -f -m raid1 -d raid1 /dev/sdd /dev/sde # mount /dev/sdd /mnt # echo 1 > /sys/block/sde/device/delete # btrfs balance start --force -mdup -dsingle /mnt This will lead to the filesystem mounted RO, with the following error messages: sd 6:0:0:0: [sde] Synchronizing SCSI cache ata7.00: Entering standby power mode btrfs: attempt to access beyond end of device sde: rw=6145, sector=21696, nr_sectors = 32 limit=0 btrfs: attempt to access beyond end of device sde: rw=6145, sector=21728, nr_sectors = 32 limit=0 btrfs: attempt to access beyond end of device sde: rw=6145, sector=21760, nr_sectors = 32 limit=0 BTRFS error (device sdd): bdev /dev/sde errs: wr 1, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 BTRFS error (device sdd): bdev /dev/sde errs: wr 2, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 BTRFS error (device sdd): bdev /dev/sde errs: wr 3, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 BTRFS error (device sdd): bdev /dev/sde errs: wr 3, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0 btrfs: attempt to access beyond end of device sde: rw=145409, sector=128, nr_sectors = 8 limit=0 BTRFS warning (device sdd): lost super block write due to IO error on /dev/sde (-5) BTRFS error (device sdd): bdev /dev/sde errs: wr 4, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0 btrfs: attempt to access beyond end of device sde: rw=14337, sector=131072, nr_sectors = 8 limit=0 BTRFS warning (device sdd): lost super block write due to IO error on /dev/sde (-5) BTRFS error (device sdd): bdev /dev/sde errs: wr 5, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0 BTRFS error (device sdd): error writing primary super block to device 2 BTRFS info (device sdd): balance: start -dconvert=single -mconvert=dup -sconvert=dup BTRFS info (device sdd): relocating block group 1372585984 flags data|raid1 BTRFS error (device sdd): bdev /dev/sde errs: wr 5, rd 0, flush 2, corrupt 0, gen 0 BTRFS warning (device sdd): chunk 2446327808 missing 1 devices, max tolerance is 0 for writable mount BTRFS: error (device sdd) in write_all_supers:4044: errno=-5 IO failure (errors while submitting device barriers.) BTRFS info (device sdd state E): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device sdd state E): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS error (device sdd state EA): Transaction aborted (error -5) BTRFS: error (device sdd state EA) in cleanup_transaction:2017: errno=-5 IO failure BTRFS info (device sdd state EA): balance: ended with status: -5 [CAUSE] Btrfs doesn't have any runtime device error handling, it fully rely on the extra copy provided. For the sysfs block device removal, normally there is a device shutdown callback to the running fs, but unfortunately btrfs doesn't support this callback yet. Thus even with that device removed, btrfs will still access that removed device (both read and write, even if they will fail). Normally for a full RAID1 btrfs, it will still be fine reading/write the fs as usual. The proper action is to replace the removed/missing/failing device with a newer one using `btrfs device replace`. But when doing the convert, btrfs will allocate new metadata chunks on to the removed device (which will lose all writes). And since the new metadata profile is DUP, which can not handle any missing device of that metadata chunk, finally it triggers the final protection at transaction commit time, and flips the filesystem to RO, before causing any real data loss. [DOC ENHANCEMENT] Add a warning to the `convert` filter about the dangerous doing convert to a lower redundancy profile when there is a known failing/removed device. And mention the proper way to handle such failing/missing device. The root fix is to introduce a failing/removed device detection for btrfs, but that will be a pretty big feature and will take quite some time before landing it upstream. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/ Reported-by: Jeff Siddall <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information