-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 409
Disable APIExport VirtualWorkspace URL population #3411
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
dcd5f3c
to
ddbde29
Compare
/test all |
ddbde29
to
241ce5c
Compare
/test all |
1 similar comment
/test all |
82a0632
to
ef8f163
Compare
/test all |
ef8f163
to
eaa52a9
Compare
25557c4
to
73128cb
Compare
d347404
to
471adde
Compare
Signed-off-by: Mangirdas Judeikis <[email protected]> On-behalf-of: @SAP [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Mangirdas Judeikis <[email protected]> On-behalf-of: @SAP [email protected]
471adde
to
2bba901
Compare
/retest |
|
69f213b
to
32c7fef
Compare
The APIExportEndpointSlice is automatically created when an APIExport is created. Shouldn't it be also cleaned up once the APIExport is gone? |
There is an owner reference on the |
/retest |
32c7fef
to
4a4809b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two minor things.
if err := c.updateVirtualWorkspaceURLs(ctx, apiExport); err != nil { | ||
conditions.MarkFalse( | ||
apiExport, | ||
apisv1alpha2.APIExportVirtualWorkspaceURLsReady, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question: What happens to this condition when the feature gate is disabled (i.e. the default from the next release)? Should we clean this up somehow? Otherwise we will have a dangling condition on APIExports
from previous versions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good call. I think we should remove this in else statment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On a similar note, what do we do about APIExports that have the virtual workspace URL set? Should we maybe also wipe them?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updated with both
c134635
to
fd0b98b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: a60fcfefb417cc8eed222612aba43db289555f62
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: embik The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Summary
Disable APIExport URL population.
What Type of PR Is This?
/kind feature
/kind deprecation
Related Issue(s)
Fixes #3366
Release Notes