Skip to content

Conversation

guilherme-n-l
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @guilherme-n-l, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

Hello team, gemini-code-assist here to provide a summary of this pull request by @guilherme-n-l. This PR focuses on improving the documentation in the README.md file. The primary goal is to make the instructions for building the NixOS image clearer and to add a dedicated section for troubleshooting common issues that users might encounter during the build process. Specifically, it adds steps to ensure the build command is run from the correct directory and provides guidance on resolving memory and temporary space problems within the Lima VM environment.

Highlights

  • Added Troubleshooting Section: Introduced a new 'Troubleshooting' section in the README to help users diagnose and fix common errors.
  • Provided Solutions for Build Errors: Included specific troubleshooting steps and commands for resolving issues related to insufficient memory in the builder VM and lack of space in the /tmp directory within the Lima VM.

Changelog

  • README.md
    • Added git clone and cd nixos-lima commands before the nix build command in the 'build image' section (Lines 15-16).
    • Added a new 'Troubleshooting' section (Line 32).
    • Added a subsection 'Errors while building image' (Line 34).
    • Included guidance and commands for insufficient memory in the builder VM (Lines 36-41).
    • Included guidance and commands for insufficient space in the /tmp directory inside the lima VM (Lines 43-48).
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


Docs make things clear,
Fixing problems, step by step,
Builds now succeed.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request significantly improves the README by adding crucial setup steps (cloning the repository before building) and a very helpful troubleshooting section. These changes will undoubtedly make it easier for users to get started and resolve common issues. I have a couple of suggestions to further enhance the clarity and correctness of the new instructions.

Summary of Findings

  • Clarity of Lima VM Configuration Path: The placeholder for the Lima VM configuration path (<PATH_TO_VM_CONFIG>/<FILE>.yaml) could be more specific to help users easily locate their configuration file. Suggested providing a more common path structure and how to find the VM instance name.
  • Missing sudo for mount command: The mount command in the troubleshooting section for increasing /tmp size is missing sudo, which is required for its execution. This could lead to the command failing for users.
  • Temporary nature of /tmp remount (low severity - not commented): The mount -o remount command for /tmp provides a temporary solution for increasing its size; the change will be lost on reboot. While not a critical issue, mentioning this or suggesting a more permanent solution (if one is simple and common for Lima VMs) could be beneficial for users. (This was not added as a direct comment due to review settings for severity.)

Merge Readiness

This pull request adds valuable information to the README. However, there's a high-severity issue (missing sudo for the mount command) and a medium-severity clarity improvement (Lima VM config path) that should be addressed before merging. Once these changes are made, the PR will be in a much better state. As a reviewer, I am not authorized to approve pull requests, but I recommend addressing the identified issues. Other reviewers should then perform a final check.

guilherme-n-l and others added 3 commits May 31, 2025 22:41
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant