Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add gsoc24 blogpost #1253

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Honyii
Copy link

@Honyii Honyii commented Jan 6, 2025

closes #1252

@Honyii Honyii requested a review from a team as a code owner January 6, 2025 16:56
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Welcome to the JSON Schema Community. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request!! 🎉🎉 We are so excited you are here! We hope this is only the first of many! For more details check out README.md file.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

built with Refined Cloudflare Pages Action

⚡ Cloudflare Pages Deployment

Name Status Preview Last Commit
website ✅ Ready (View Log) Visit Preview f4382d3

@abhayymishraa
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @Honyii ,
i think you did a small typo in Line-#85
it shoud be focuses instead of "focu ses"
Haha i was seriously reading that and some how i found out!!!
Thank You!!!

@abhayymishraa
Copy link
Contributor

Looks great :)

@Honyii
Copy link
Author

Honyii commented Jan 6, 2025

@abhayymishraa thanks for reading through - fixed the typo

@abhayymishraa
Copy link
Contributor

abhayymishraa commented Jan 6, 2025

@Honyii no need for thanks its just i'm intrested in this blog post!!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (5114356) to head (f4382d3).
Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1253   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           10        10           
  Lines          373       373           
  Branches        94        94           
=========================================
  Hits           373       373           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@benjagm benjagm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great to me.

@Relequestual
Copy link
Member

This looks great.
However, I wanted to check, did the Bowtie long-term reporting project actually get done? I don't see / can't find any work product.

@benjagm
Copy link
Collaborator

benjagm commented Jan 7, 2025

This looks great. However, I wanted to check, did the Bowtie long-term reporting project actually get done? I don't see / can't find any work product.

Tagging @Julian to get insights on this.

@Julian
Copy link
Member

Julian commented Jan 7, 2025

The output is the "Versions Trend" graphs that appear for the implementations which have had long-term reporting enabled -- e.g. see https://bowtie.report/#/implementations/java-json-schema and https://bowtie.report/#/implementations/js-hyperjump

@Relequestual
Copy link
Member

@Julian Awesome. Thanks for the info.
What's the reason this isn't something that can be enabled by default? (I'm assuming some complexity that is not obvious).

@Julian
Copy link
Member

Julian commented Jan 7, 2025

We have to go to each implementation harness and support all old versions of it basically (and we only had time to do that for like 6 or 7 during GSoC).

If I get some funding for Bowtie at some point I'd love to actually split each implementation off into its own harness repo and then have it be a bit easier to do this. But yeah that's the work essentially, implementations are very often very wildly backwards incompatible with themselves...

@Relequestual
Copy link
Member

facepalm yeah, this seems rather obvious.
I'd love to talk more about how we can define and seek funding for specific projects. This is similar but not identical to the discussion/work @benjagm is doing regarding supporting implementers more broadly. I still think there's ideally sound foundational work to be done first, but I'm not able to do that work right now, nor will I stand in the way of getting the ball rolling of anything which might help and enable the ecosystem!

@benjagm
Copy link
Collaborator

benjagm commented Jan 10, 2025

Are we ok with merging this post?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

✨ Enhancement: Google summer of code 2024 wrapup post
5 participants